Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t), l <br />j <br />-~. <br /> <br />;~ <br />.;0' <br />t. <br />'1l <br />'-! <br />, <br />;i <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~i <br /> <br />., <br />! <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to secu e reliable service for metropolitan Los Angeles, <br />and tha they correspond with operating practices of <br />major u ilities elsewhere as applied to existing condi- <br />tions. In this respect, I think they have endeavored to <br />be fair in their assumptions. The principal difference <br />between their study and my study is largely in the amount <br />of rese va capacity. I have applied the practices of <br />some of the other major utilities. which results in <br />graate reserve for both the Boulder system and the sub- <br />stitut1 steam plant than that used by the Bureau engineers.. <br />I h~ve also obtained the value of falling water forpri- <br />mary e ergy on the basis of private ownership in addition <br /> <br />t, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />., <br />"j <br /> <br />to pub ic ownership which shows that under private owner- <br /> <br />ship t e allowable rate for falling water in competition <br />with s earn power would be less than under public owner- <br /> <br />ship. <br /> <br />Oomparative results of my study and that of the <br /> <br /> <br />Power urcau engineers are discussed in detail in Section <br /> <br /> <br />III of this report and are summarized in the follo''1ing <br /> <br />tablo: <br /> <br />.-j <br />, <br /> <br />'1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A. B. Roberts <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br /> <br />~i.._cJ.~ <br /> <br />