Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />f.:? <br />..., <br />.' J; <br />'j.M <br />~ <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />a c parison of the value of falling water for primary <br /> <br />ene y. <br /> <br />For this purpose I have assumed a maximum of <br />4,87 ,000,000 .kw-hrs. per year at Boulder and an average <br />of 4 080,000,000 ~N-hrS. of primary energy per year, <br />equi alent.to 3,774,000,000 kw-hrs. delivered at Los An- <br />gele , allowing for 71% transmission losses. This energy; <br />woul require a maximum peak of 987,500 kw. at Boulder Dall) <br />and a peak of 913,437 kw. at Los Angeles with 7~.% loss. <br />The n mber of generating units at.Boulder required during <br />periO s of low water at 66,000 kw. per unit would oe 16 <br />units, l5 active units plus 1 spare. During perious of <br />high ter, at 82,500 kw. per unit, there would be required <br />l3 uni s, l2 units plus one spare, for$enerating primary <br />energy alone, the remaining units being available for <br />genera ing secondary energy. Based upon a delivered <br />capaci y of 120,000 kw. per circuit, 7~ circuits would be <br />requir d to deliver the maximum capacity. However, as a <br />practi .1 sitUation one group of 3 circuits will handle <br />390,000 kw. and 2 groups of 2 circuits each will handle <br />480,000 kw., or a total of 870,000 kw., therefore, ? cir- <br />cuits w re used in my study. <br /> <br />As ~~s been previously discussed, I have used <br /> <br /> <br />840,000 kw. of steam standby, which, in my opinion, is <br /> <br /> <br />the ver minimum for relitibility of transmission for the <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />A. B. Roberts <br /> <br />i, <br /> <br />27. <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br />-r <br />~ <br /> <br />.\ <br />;1 <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br />J <br />1 <br />~ <br />il <br />~ <br />~: <br />~, <br />. <br />~ <br />1 <br />1 <br />