My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08998
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:24:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.05
Description
CRSP - Boulder Dam
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
1
Date
10/31/1938
Title
Report of Competitive Value of Falling Water for Primary Energy at Boulder Dam in Competition with Steam Power at the Load Center
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />( ''') <br /> <br />""'^' <br />Mh <br />..... <br />Q:) <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />-.t <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />j <br />.\ <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />tojpay for a definite quantity 0# firm energy at 1.63 mllls <br />pe kWThr., whether used or not, and under the Third Oir- <br />cu t Contract, for a definite quantity of secondary ene~gy <br />unt 1 May 3l, 1945, at the rate of .5 mills. The incre~ <br />men al cost of energy in excess of the commitment, up to <br />the total option for secondary energy, 1s at the rate of .5 <br />mil S for second.n'y, whet'eas, if the Bureau owned the hy'liro <br />pl1. t, the total incremental cost at Boulder power plant in <br />dol rs would be unappreciable, or even zero. <br />A. H. Markwart, Vice President of the Pacifio Gas <br />and,lectric Oompany (in the September l, 1930 issue of <br />lJ.fUe trical WestlJ), made an economic study to determine 'the <br />prop rt10ns in which steam plants and hydro plants should <br /> <br />.'} <br /> <br /> <br />be b <br /> <br />serve growing load in order to realize maximum <br /> <br /> <br />over 11 system ec.onomy' based upon an annual system load <br />fact of 60%, and his study indicated that 70,% of tbe peak <br /> , <br /> hydro and 30,% " <br />shoul be carried by by steam, I have made a , <br />simil r study, using for the hydro tbe special costs per-, <br /> <br />taini g to the Boulder Canyon Project which shows that the <br />minim m cOst per kw-hr. delivered would be obtained under <br />the f llowing conditions: <br /> <br />" <br />.i <br /> <br />/i <br /> <br />F r a charge of l.63 millsl <br />k -hr. for falling water at <br />B ulder . <br /> <br />I the charge for falling <br />w ter is reduced to 1.~O mill <br /> <br />Percent of Peak Demand <br />Carried by Steam <br /> <br />,{ <br />~l <br /> <br />, <br />~,- <br />.j <br />., <br />; <br />1~ <br />';1 <br /> <br />100,% <br /> <br />30,% <br /> <br />A. B. Roberts <br /> <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.