My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08995
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:23:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8410.350
Description
Basin Multistate Organizations - Missouri Basin Inter-Agency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
6/27/1968
Author
MBIAC
Title
Comprehensive Framework Study - Fourth Annual Report by Standing Committee to MBIAC
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f'....:{" ... <br /> <br />GS~1~ <br />l~~"" <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />As would be expected the population in the Platte-Niobrara Basin shows <br />the largest increase an~ that for the Middle ~issouri River Tributaries <br />shovs the lo~est projected increase, ~hich is consistent with the growth <br />pattern of these two regions during the period of 1940 to 1960. Employ. <br />ment follows about the same pattern. On per capita income the Western <br />Dakota Tributaries shov the greatest projected growth and the Platte. <br />Niobrara Basin the least projected grovth. <br /> <br />., <br />!,~f:~~ <br />,,,.- <br /> <br />.:'-. <br />.. <br /> <br />" <br />,<" <br /> <br />:~. <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />Of some interest <br />among the subregions. <br />chart belovo <br /> <br />is the relative distribution of the population <br />The points raised above are illustrated in the <br /> <br />',,' <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />'.,' <br />'. <br /> <br /> <br />'~" <br /> <br />(/:.: <br /> <br />-"';\ <br />,~,.>::..., <br />:<': "'-- <br />-~~:< <br /> <br />, ' <br />. <br /> <br />, , <br />" <br />I<~:": . <br />""--.- <br /> <br />, <br />"<-,-:'" <br /> <br />t\:~< <br />~;~:~~:~: <br /> <br />~-,-. <br /> <br />, ~.' <br /> <br />'":':'.' <br />~"-;:";"; <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />~:/~'- <br />.',~:_-). <br /> <br />This chart shows many of the subbasins carrying through time both <br />historical and projected vith approximately the same proportion of the <br />Basin's population. The Platte River Basin shows an increasing propor- <br />tion of the Basin's population, both historical and during the projected <br />period. The Eastern Dakota Tributaries, the Middle t-!issouri Tributaries <br />and the Kansas all show some decrease} both historically and projected. <br />This follows the projection technique where the historical trends are <br />utilized for projecting. <br /> <br />'.f\-~.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~.. .;,-, <br />,~: "-: <br />-;.',' ~ <br />~~:;~: <br />.<~~:; <br />, <br />.'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It should be brought out that the tren~indicated in this projection <br />are merely indications and can be changed due to various resource <br />development and activities on the part of the local interests or other <br />circumstances ~hich might substantially change the trends at any time in <br />the future. <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />~~:~'.:~;~i:~~ <br /> <br />,:,.>;~':..,~:..:;"'. '.- , <br /> <br />.' <br />~ <br /> <br />-,;....-)'; <br />.~ '.- <br /> <br />,..;>, = <br /> <br />,:/"";~r-" -' '_~'< <br /> <br />.. '. ~~.' -::;-. \ <br />" <br /> <br />> , <br />~;~'~~';'~""'l::":' <br /> <br />-'..,: <br />....;.-..._~.?Y',,-t" -"~-;".JF"'''''''''' . <br /> <br />.~- ,C!'..,~~ <br /> <br /><.~ <br /> <br />'~ '- ~ ~~"<~~'~:1!::T-:~:2.~'~~~~~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.