Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />602 Park lbint Dr. Suite 275 <br />Golden, Colorado 80401 <br />FAX (303) 526-2624 <br />(303) 526-2600 <br /> <br />September 25, 1996 <br /> <br />Mr. Will W. Burt <br />Deputy State Engineer <br />Division of Water Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> <br />RECE\\JEO <br />SEP 27 19$ <br /> <br />-"'OUi-~i:.S <br />WI<. "",'\ r\lO", ....;ca <br />STATE ENG..-' <br />CCLOo <br /> <br />Re: Proposal for Services <br />Phase I Denver Basin Study <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Burt: <br /> <br />Martin and Wood Water Consultants, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal for <br />hydrogeologic consulting services relating to the Phase I analyses of the Senate Bill 96-153 <br />Denver Basin Aquifer Economic Life Assessment. <br /> <br />Martin and Wood has had extensive experience in ground water flow modeling throughout <br />various hydrogeologic regions in Colorado, and in providing hydrogeologic consulting <br />specifically in the Denver Basin. We thus have a very strong familiarity with current <br />conditions in the Basin and have been involved with one recent study that incorporated <br />growth projections and water usage analyses for portions of Douglas and Arapahoe Counties. <br />The enclosed Statement of Qualifications presents a more detailed description of our <br />qualifications and of a representative selection of some of our past projects. In addition, we <br />have carried out numerous valuations relating to Denver Basin aquifer assets, as well as <br />surface water assets. In this capacity we have developed an extensive in-house database of <br />past water transactions, and in some cases, have evaluated water prices with respect to their <br />relationship to the economic feasibility of continued resource development. We have very <br />strong familiarity with the South Platte River system and the operation and administration of <br />the various water rights associated with it. Finally, we have extensive programming <br />experience that allows us to tailor model codes so that the most meaningful output formats <br />can be generated, facilitating easier operation and understanding of results. <br /> <br />For the Phase I model adequacy assessment we propose the following scope of work. <br /> <br />A. Review the existing Senate Bill 5 model data sets for suitability to the <br />Phase II economic assessment task. <br />