My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08945
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08945
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:22:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section D General Compact Issues - US Water Resources Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/1/1971
Author
US Water Resources C
Title
Summary - Obers Review Meetings - Held July 1971 - RE-Economic Activity in the US by Water Resources Region and Subarea-Historic and Projected-1929-2020
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00292lz <br /> <br />of unified plans for the management of land and water resources. An impor- <br /> <br /> <br />tant underlying premise is that the decision-making process can be enhanced <br /> <br /> <br />by the development and uSe of economic information designed specifically to <br /> <br /> <br />serve the planning process. Economic projections may.be viewed in this <br /> <br />context. <br /> <br />Experience over the past few years in river basin planning strengthens <br /> <br />our conviction that projections of economic activity and resource use should <br /> <br />be employed as a reference point for analytical work; and that the system of <br /> <br />analysis used in developing baseline projections can eventually be employed <br />to great advantage for evaluation purposes. The multiobjective evaluation <br /> <br />and the system of accounts being considered by the Water Resources Council <br /> <br />will require substantial analytical work in estimating the magnitude and <br /> <br />regional incidence of beneficial and adverse effects of alternative programs. <br /> <br />Given the with-without orientation of meaningful evaluation systems, imple- <br /> <br />mentation of the new principles and standards must rely on a set of inter- <br /> <br />regionally consistent baseline projections. <br /> <br />A second consideration that bears on the projections program is the <br /> <br />persistent request for basic data and projections for different geographic <br /> <br />delineations. We are aware, for. example, of the desire for State projections. <br /> <br />The need for land use projections by economic areas is alsor.eadily.apparent. <br /> <br />In order to satisfy these demands, the projection system must have great <br /> <br />flexibility and must employ fairly complex transformation programs. <br /> <br />Finally, we are fully aware of the need and well articulated demand for <br /> <br />alternative projections. At frequent intervals, a new "what if" type of <br /> <br />question appears on the horizon. What if we had a national policy on population <br /> <br />-3 <br /> <br />ii~ <br />I <br /> <br />. .~. - '.":. <br />;.~-.~ :.~.~.- <br />.-',.';'-"." <br />'::;':;?::':'!.~. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~J: .:~_~..-~. <br /> <br />,.J~ <br /> <br />.;.;:<::". ~"- <br />:'.". '.;>~'- <br />it~t~;t~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.