Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~~~:~l <br /> <br />could be potentially used by another entity facing shortages (regionaliza- <br />tion or regional integration of available water supplies). <br /> <br />Although complete regionalization of water supplies is not realistic. <br />making the assumption of total regionalization provides a useful upper bound <br />estimate of the benefits that could be attained. For example in Study Area <br />1, if water-short entities could utilize surplus supplies from other <br />entities, there would be no shortages with available supplies, except during <br />a severe drought, until about the year 2015, and the shortages during a <br />moderate-level drought in 2020 would be reduced from about 51,000 ac-ft to <br />16,000 ac-ft. With regional integration across Study Areas 1 and 2, <br />projected shortages during a moderate-level drought in the year 2020 within <br />Study Area 2 could be reduced from about 16,000 ac-ft to 9,000 ac-ft. The <br />shortages projected for all of Study Area 3 can not be significantly offset <br />through regional integration of supplies. However, since 98,000 ac-ft of <br />the 120,000 ac-ft shortage projected for Study Area 3 is attributable to the <br />City of Aurora alone, some of the shortages projected for Study Area 3 could <br />be reduced through regional integration of water supplies with Study Areas 1 <br />and 2. <br /> <br />Oeve70Daent of A7ternatives for Enhanced Use of ReQiona7 Water SUDD7ies <br /> <br />To develop alternatives for increasing the use efficiency of existing water <br />supplies on a regional basis, individual water providers were grouped into <br />five geographic core areas. The groupings were based on future needs, <br />geographic location, and the potential enhancements that could be realized <br />through participation in regional water supply facilities. <br /> <br />Future needs were characterized in terms of both raw water and treated <br />water. Raw water needs were quantified as described previously. The needs <br />for future water treatment capacity were addressed by comparing the capacity <br />of existing water treatment plants, based on compliance with the Safe <br />Drinking Water Act (SDWA), with projected future treated water demands. <br /> <br />-13- <br />