Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0053 <br /> <br />3.5 <br /> <br />[ ,;"';':: <br />~"... i _ <br /> <br />Streamflows in the Fryingpan River under p~esent operating conditions for <br />i " <br />Ruedi Reservoir have been altered compared tot~ose of the natural watershed. <br />i <br />Flows in the winter months of November through pebruary currently average 111 <br /> <br />, " <br />cfs while unregulated winter flows would average 39 cfs. Peak flows in June <br /> <br /> <br />currently average 296 cfs while unregulated flows would average 1,024 cfs'. <br /> <br /> <br />The present operation of the Ruedi Reservoir thus reduces peak summer flows in <br /> <br />the Fryingpan River and augments winter flows. Table 3.2 gives monthly flows <br /> <br /> <br />in the Fryingpan River for the probable average:, probable dry and probable wet <br /> <br />years. <br /> <br />The average annual undepleted water yie'ld from the Fryingpan watershed <br />i <br /> <br />is 164,500 acre-feet (period of record from 1948 to 1980). Average depletions <br /> <br />by diversions in the headwaters of the watershed are 59,800 acre~feet (53,400 <br /> <br /> <br />for Fryingpan-Arkansas project and 6,400 for Busk-Ivanhoe). Average depleted <br /> <br /> <br />inflow to Ruedi Reservoir is 104,700 acre-feet, which is slightly in excess of <br /> <br /> <br />the reservoir capacity of 102,400 acre-feet. <br /> <br />The ROaring Fork above its confluence with the Fryingpan is largely unre- <br /> <br /> <br />gulated. This upper portion of the ROaring Fo~k watershed produces some 45 <br /> <br />. ,. <br /> <br />percent of the water yield from the entire Roaring Fork watershed, Remaining <br /> <br /> <br />water yield comes primarily from the FryingpanRiver (19 percent) 'and the <br /> <br />crystai1River (32 percent). The Roaring Fork ~ver below the Fryingpart c6n~ <br /> <br />, ' <br />. .' " <br />fluence extends 27 miles from Basalt to Glenwood Springs with an average 'gra- <br />. . -.- .: <br />dient of 27 feet per mile. The river has a bO~lder and cobble bed cha~nei <br /> <br />" ' <br />along most of its <br />animal flood except ih <br /> <br />which is well incised into the alluvial valley 'deposits <br /> <br /> <br />length, The channel has adequate capacity for the mean <br /> <br /> <br />some low-lying flood plain areas. <br /> <br />The strearnflows in the ROaring Fork River:are typi~~l of the natural <br /> <br /> <br />runoff cycle of high mountain watersheds. Tabi~ 3.3 gives probable average <br />" <br /> <br />I1lonthly flows for ,the ROaring Fork River at Gl~nwood. Average' water yie1'd <br /> <br />, , I .. <br />from the Roaring Fork watershed is 857,000 acre-feet, Diversion by the Hunter <br /> <br />Creek collection system of the Fryingpan-Arkan$as project averages 16,100 <br /> <br /> <br />acre-feet. <br /> <br />Most of the potential uses for Ruedi Reservoir water are 'located in the <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado River valley from Glenwood Springs to! Grand Junction. The control~ <br /> <br />ling senior water rights are located on the cotorado River in the Grand <br />, <br />i <br />Junction area, The Ruedi Reservoir rights are relatively junior in comparison <br /> <br /> <br />with these rights, therefore wh;n the Frylngpan-Arkansas collection system is <br /> <br /> <br />operating, a replacement release is required when a shortage of water occurs <br />