|
<br />.
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />2.Q0~,
<br />
<br />Table 1, Summa Effects on Fish and Wildlife, provides a
<br />comparison of t e various uses on a project asls w t out and with
<br />the project In operation and shows the sources of the benefits.
<br />
<br /> Table I. Summary of Project Effects on Fish and Wi Idllfe
<br /> Kind No. of Units
<br />Use of WI thout With Gain or Benef I ts
<br /> Unit Project Project Loss
<br /> Fishing, Warmwater !!
<br /> Narrows Reservoir Han-day 0 100,000 100,000 $150,000
<br /> Below Narrows Dam, 5.5 mi. Han-day 0 1,000 1,000 1,500
<br /> Hunting
<br /> Upland Game Y Han-day 34,800 10,000 -24,800
<br /> Waterf~,l 'J! Han-day 15,900 21,500 5,600 25,200
<br /> Othe r _ Han-day 1,000 200 -800
<br /> Waterfowl Use 2! Use-day I ,500 ,000 4,500,000 3 ,000,000 20,400
<br /> Trapping Y Pelt 1,400 300 -1,100
<br />. Wild 11 fe-oriented Recreat Ion 1! Han-day 0 2,000 2,000 1,000
<br />Total Benefl ts $198,100
<br />
<br />11
<br />
<br />Fishing for walleyes, northern pike, largemouth bass, white bass, crappies,
<br />other sunfishes, catfish, and suckers.
<br />Hunting for pheasants, cottontails, mourning doves, and bobwhites.
<br />Hunting for mallards, plntalls, American widgeons, blue-wlnged teal,
<br />gadwalls, and Canada geese.
<br />Sport hunting for raccoons, coyotes, and foxes.
<br />Heasured by waterfowl use-days, one duck or goose spending a day on the area
<br />being one waterfowl use-day. Although a gain In overall waterfowl use Is
<br />shown, the project would result In a loss of 1,000 waterfowl raised.
<br />Trapping for raccoons, mink, muskrats, skunks, beavers, foxes, and weasels.
<br />Consisting of nature study, bird-watching, photography, and related fish
<br />and wildlife-oriented activities.
<br />
<br />2,
<br />It
<br />41
<br />~
<br />
<br />61
<br />7!
<br />
<br />.
<br />
|