Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />o <br />tv <br />N <br /> <br />United States Geological Survey <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program <br />Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 1996 <br /> <br />Arizona <br /> <br />Well Inventory .ofthe Lower Colorado River Flood Plain and Adjacent Areas in Arizona, . <br />California, Nevada, and Utah <br /> <br />The U.S. Supreme Court decree, 1964, Arizona versus California, is specific about the. <br />responsibility of the Secretary of the Interior to account for consumptive use of water from the. <br />mainstream; consumptive use is defined to include, "water drawn from the mainstream by <br />underground pumping." Water pumped from wells on the flood plain is presumed to be Colorado <br />River water and the accounting surface can be used to identify wells outside the flood plain in and <br />near the lower Colorado River valley that yield water that will be replaced by water from the river. <br />The objective of this cooperative project between the U.S. Geological Survey and the Bureau.of <br />Reclamation is to inventory wells on the lower Colorado River flood plain and adjacent areas in . <br />Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah. Work on the project began in April 1994 to locate wells, <br />provide current information for each well, and provide precise position information in .order to <br />apply the accounting-surface method and include the appropriate wells in water accounting along <br />the river. Water levels are required, where possible, for all wells in areas adjacent to the flood. <br />plain. In Arizona and California, over 1,200 wells have been inventoried in the Yuma area, over <br />500 wells in and near the Colorado River Indian Reservation, and about 125 wells on the <br />Chemehuevi Indian Reservation. Data have been updated or entered into the.U.S. Geological <br />Survey ground-water data base on over 1,250 wells. <br /> <br />California <br /> <br />Three indicators of salinity have been obtained as part of a two-year binational toxins monitoring. <br />program on the New and Colorado Rivers. They are 1) Residue on evaporation at 180 degrees <br />Centigrade; 2) Calculated sum of major constituents; and 3) Specific conductance. <br /> <br />Samples were collected in June 1995 from the All-American Canal below the Imperial Dam <br />diversion and from the Colorado River at the Northerly International Boundary (NIB) near Yuma <br />(above the Morales Dam diversion to the Mexicali Valley). The salinity values are typical for the <br />Colorado River, but deceptive at the downstream site in this case. Last year the Gila Riverwas still <br />contributing flow to the NIB site, which would ordinarily result in lowered salinity. In this case, <br />however, salinity at the two sites is not very different; perhaps because it is well after the wet <br />season when water in the Gila River gradually increases in salinity. This year, the most recent data <br />indicates that the water in the river is even less influenced by the Gila River. Differences between <br />the two sides are especially evident in the isotope data. Gila River water is enriched in deuterium <br />and oxygen-18 and is depleted in tritium relative to upstream Colorado River water. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />