My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08880
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:01 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:19:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.500.10
Description
Price and San Rafael Basin Unit - Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1986
Title
Evaluation of the Incremental Cost Effectiveness of Building a Combined Pressurized Sprinkler Irrigation System to Reduce Salt Loading to the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The Soil Conservation Service evaluated three alternative plans: <br /> <br />1. Future conditions without project <br /> <br />2. Improved water management with minimwn works of improvement <br /> <br />3. National Economic Development Plan (NED) <br /> <br />Tole I.~LD clan was selected as the Soil Conser-vation Service Rec01t1mended Plan <br /> <br />and the farmer selected plan. Al though local interests have expressed their <br /> <br />preference for this plan the cost sharing requirements presents obstacles for <br /> <br />many farmers to implement these improvements. <br /> <br />Comb ined Plan <br /> <br />In order to alleviate the cost to the local farmers the SCS and Reclamation <br /> <br />have explored the possibility of building a pressurized sprinkler irrigation <br /> <br />system. Under this plan Reclamation would build the main distribution system <br /> <br />and the SCS would be responsible for the on-farm sprinkler systems. <br /> <br />The incremental cost associated with developing the plan is presented in <br /> <br />Table 1. <br /> <br />If the combined plan were to be buil t. this would preclude the construction of <br /> <br />any independent plans by SCS and Reclamation. <br /> <br />Under Reclamation's plan of winter watering, stock ponds would be lined and <br /> <br />enlarged to eliminate the need for running water through canals during the <br /> <br />winter months. Under the comb ined pI an. wate r for I ivestock would be del i- <br /> <br />vered through the main distribution system to stock watering troughs. <br /> <br />ODCC4B <br /> <br />III <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.