My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08880
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:01 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:19:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.500.10
Description
Price and San Rafael Basin Unit - Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1986
Title
Evaluation of the Incremental Cost Effectiveness of Building a Combined Pressurized Sprinkler Irrigation System to Reduce Salt Loading to the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Water and salt budgets developed by the SCS indicate that for each acre-foot <br /> <br />of water that can be prevented from entering the ground water system in the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. ,,': I- ,.~. ;, ~ <br />- - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ <br /> <br />..,....~ ... <br />c~ c ,_ a. , <br /> <br />2.6 tar:.s ,;: ss.lt per v2ar .,:~ll be pre\'ented from entering <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />the Colorado River. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It was agreed to use a salt loading factor of 2.4 tons per acre-foot of water <br /> <br />for estimating salt reduction for the combined plan. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Plan Formulation <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The 1\ureau of Reclamation in its independent activities identified a total of <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />29 alt-,=rnative components in 12 broad categories as possible ways to reduce <br /> <br />salt loading. Through a process of screening and input from an interagency <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />planning team, 8 alternative plans, plus the future without the project, were <br /> <br />selected for development of appraisal level designs and cost estimates. These <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />alternatives were: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. Irrigation improvements ( winter watering) <br />2. Drainwater for cooling <br />3. Drainwater treatment or disposal <br />4. Drainwater for industrial use <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5. Selective withdrawal <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6. and 7. Retire farmland and use the freshwater for other beneficial uses <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.8. Coal slurry pipel ine and powerplant cool ing options <br /> <br />From these alternatives the winter watering option was selected as the recom- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />mended pl an. <br /> <br />This plan consists of lining the stock watering ponds to elimi- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />nate the need for running water in a number of canals during the winter. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />',; . (iA <br />t.k .t' <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.