Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, <br />,j <br /> <br />BUREAU OF SPORT FISBERIES AND WILDLIFE <br /> <br />of the year and except for some tributary inflow, the Williams Fork River <br />could be dewatered from the site of this proposed impoundment to Denver's <br />existing Williams Fork Reservoir. <br /> <br />The Parshall Project area embraces a portion of the winter range <br />available to the important mule deer and elk herds of Middle Park. The <br />area south of Kremmling and east of the Blue River, inclUding Junction <br />Butte (also known as Elk Mountain), is used during severe winters. Lands <br />north and east of the proposed Skylark Canal, as well as those in the Syl- <br />van area, now Serve as fall and spring range for mule deer which winter <br />on Cedar Ridge northwest of iiilliams Fork Reservoir. <br /> <br />Upland game includes sage grouse and blue grouse, mourning doves, <br />cottontails, and snowshoe hares. Various species of ducks and fur animals, <br />of which the beaver is the most important, inhabit the i-lilliams Fork River <br />and its tributaries. <br /> <br />Project lands already under irrigation are devoted mostly to the pro- <br />duction of alfalfa. The acreage slated for irrigation consists for the <br />most part of rolling hills and flats which are noVl covered by sagebrush. <br />Most of the Ute Park Reservoir site is in grasses and forbs except for <br />streamside willows, cottonwoods, and shrubs and aspens, and conifers close <br />to the proposed highwater line. <br /> <br />The present pattern of use by big game may be changed adversely with <br />development of the Parshall Project. It'''is assumed that standards and <br />specifications for the main irrigation canals would provide that they <br />would not be barriers to established migration routes. However, the newly <br />irrigated lands in themselves would eliminate large tracts of present range <br />for both mule deer and elk. Extension of a pattern of irrigated agricul- <br />ture, especially in the Sylvan area where the situation is already serious, <br />would increase the big-game damage problems which confront the Colorado <br />Department of Game and Fish. <br /> <br />The status Report contains the statement that, "... bypasses for fish- <br />ery purposes could not be made through the Ute Park Reservoir." It is the <br />opinion of our Bureau and the Colorado Department of Game and Fish that <br />fishery bypasses are necessary below the reservoir. Suitable fishery flows <br />should be maintained throughout the year in the Williams Fork River from <br />the ute Park Reservoir site to the present Williams Fork Reservoir. <br /> <br />As pointed out above, the major effects of the Parshall Project upon <br />wildlife concern mule deer and elk. The canals rna:y have to be modified <br />to minimize their effects on established big-game migration routes. Final <br />selection of project lands should include consideration of the loss of win- <br />ter range for both mule deer and elk, and possible mitigation measures to <br />alleviate such losses. Management problems which would be brought about <br />by additional irrigated lands in an important wintering area for big game <br /> <br /> <br />25 <br />