WSP08807 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

32 But is the shortage-sharing provision really quantification of Navajo rights, and if so- the language on its face significantly omits any mention of quantity-at what amount? The answer that relies on all of the statutory language relevant to Winters claims and that pushes the meaning of that language to its logical ends, given the record, is that Navajo claims are indeed quantified at the NIIP allocation. as This is the logical implication of the rationale for the provision, combined with section 12(a) and the physical and legal availability of water in the river. According to New Mexico estimates, approximately 112,000 acre-feet of water a year was available, or not yet committed, out of New Mexico's compact entitlement for M&I uses when NIIP was under discussion.86 The tribe hoped that industry would 850ther answers are possible but are not discussed fully here. One is that the shortage-sharing provision does quantify Navajo claims, but at New Mexico's entitlement, given section 12(a). This interpretation agrees with much of the criticism of the answer addressed fully in the text, but goes on to say that New Mexico allocations of San Juan water to non-Indians prior to NIIP are invalid and should be overturned. An analysis of this issue is beyond the scope of this article. A second alternative answer, the most far- reaching of all, is that the shortage-sharing provision did not quantify Navajo claims because the whole river is Navajo, another issue beyond the scope of this article. This interpretation also requires a decision about the validity of section 12(a)'s limit on meeting Indian claims with NIlP and San Juan-Chama project works, also beyond the scope of this article. 861n 1958, New Mexico State Engineer Reynolds estimated New Mexico's entitlement under the compacts at 838,000 acre-feet a year. Of that, 237,000 acre-feet were committed to current and authorized uses. NI1P and San Juan-Chama would use an additional 362,000 acre-feet. That left "available for future developments" 238,000 acre- feet. Senate Hearin8 1958. ~ note 17 at 86. By 1959, the State Engineer had added 39,000 acre-feet to present and authorized uses, leaving 200,000 acre-feet a year "available for future developments." Of this, 112,500 were mentioned for "municipal and industrial water. The Animas-La Plata Project in New Mexico was to take 33,000 acre-feet. All this left about 20,000 acre-feet for unnamed uses. Senate Hearine 1959. ~ note 17 at 19. The State Engineer used the same figures in testimony before the House the following year. House Hearin8 1960. ~ note 41 at 78. See also Senate Hearini 1961. .mlIDl note 17 at 49. Reynolds's figure of 838,000 acre-feet was, as it is now known, $; '01 ~?-:; Sf1 ';'-