Laserfiche WebLink
<br />nit ","5("'1 <br />." ,> ~"~". , <br />_ ,~",. '.... .c. " <br /> <br />CHRONOLOGY OF THE 1976-77 DROUGHT <br /> <br />47 <br /> <br />situation in the mountains in March 1977, the <br />Denver Water Board requested residents to <br />voluntarily stop watering lawns. Later, the <br />deteriorating water supply forced the Denver <br />Water Board to abandon their program for vol- <br />untary reductions of water use and to restrict <br />la wn watering to 3 hours every third day. In <br />Grand Junction, Colo., and Price, Utah lawn <br />watering was restricted to 2 days per week, <br />and in Cortez, Colo., lawns could be watered <br />only 3 days per month. In July 1977 the city of <br />Rangely north of Grand Junction had to dis- <br />continue supplying water to an oil company, <br />A flow of 76 ft 3/s for irrigation was <br />released in March 1977 from Taylor Park <br />Reservoir in the Gunnison River basin east of <br />Grand Junction, Colo.,-a very unusual occur- <br />rence for that time of year. <br />Monticello, near the southeast corner of <br />Utah, imposed a strict water use limit of 50 <br />gal per person per day for about 2 months. <br />When rationing ended on July 1, 1977, after <br />four new shallow wells were put into produc- <br />tion, the rates were increased so that residen- <br />tial usage over 15,000 gal per month would be <br />very expensive. Also, plans were made to drill <br />a deep well to provide a firmer supply in the <br />future. <br />Vernal, Utah set up a water rationing <br />program on April 1, 1977 on an honor system. <br />Outside water use was to be limited to twice a <br />week between the hours of 6 and 12 p,m, A <br />brochure, "The Water Hole is Drying Up," was <br />prepared to educate the public on the need for <br />and how to practice conservation; and it was <br />used by the media and the schools. <br />The Governors of Colorado and Utah ap- <br />pointed special committees to coordinate acti- <br />vities related to the drought, In Utah, the <br />committee approved $500,000 of special funds <br />mainly to drill and equip wells for domestic <br />supplies at 19 locations in eight counties, The <br />committee also approved loans totaling <br />$204,000 to provide emergency water for live- <br />stock from new wells and pipelines. <br />Disaster designation was approved for 41 <br />counties in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and <br />Wyoming. <br /> <br />The Great Basin-WRC Region 16 <br /> <br />The Great Basin (fig. 18) includes most of <br />Nevada, western Utah, and parts of California, <br />Idaho, Oregon and Wyoming. The drainage <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />consists of numerous closed basins with the <br />headwaters of many streams in mountains <br />where snow is the predominant form of pre- <br />cipitation. The streams traverse valleys down <br />to lakes, sinks, or playas where there are no <br />natural surface outlets. <br />A summary of the 1976-77 drought is pre- <br />sented in the next few paragraphs. <br />Below normal precipitation, particularly as <br />snow in the mountains, produced a severe <br />drought, Frequency analyses show that on the <br />basis of streamflow, the drought had an aver- <br />age recurrence interval greater than 100 <br />years. The low runoff had to be augmented by <br />substantial reductions of storage in reservoirs, <br />and the level of Lake Tahoe was below the <br />level of its outlet for 3 months. <br />Ground-water levels in many basins did not <br />change much, but locally declines ranged up to <br />24 ft. Water quality of both ground and <br />surface water was not seriously affected. <br />Water use was restricted in some communi- <br />ties, many new wells were drilled, and emer- <br />gency actions had to be taken to provide water <br />for towns and for livestock. <br /> <br />Previous Droughts <br /> <br />Drought in the Great Basin is nothing new. <br />In 1934 when snow surveying was a relatively <br />new technique for forecasting runoff from the <br />snowpack, the water content of the snow cover <br />on March 29 in the Weber River basin north of <br />Salt Lake City, Utah was only 27 percent of <br />that in 1933. The winter was warmer than <br />average; therefore, some water users started <br />irrigating as early as the latter part of March <br />and most of them were irrigating by April 15. <br />Releases of water in storage started on <br />April 18 about 2 to 2.5 months earlier than <br />usual. There was not enough water to meet <br />everyones' needs, but most of those holding <br />older water rights temporarily gave up part of <br />their water to those with junior rights so that <br />all would be able to start irrigating. The <br />snowmelt runoff was short-lived and peaked <br />early, about May 8. <br />To augment the water supply, Federal <br />funds were used to pay for the lowering of the <br />outlets of four lakes. About 200 acre-ft was <br />obtained in this manner. Between late June <br />and early August 1934 several canal companies <br />turned off their diversions so that water could <br />be used by other canal companies to save hay <br />