My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08737
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08737
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:14:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443.600
Description
Narrows Unit - Studies
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/1/1963
Author
Water Development Co
Title
Review of Site Selection Criteria Narrows and Weld County Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Ground and aerial reconnaissance clearly show that there is a <br /> <br />major difference in the development and land use in the two reservoir areas. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />This degree of development would appear to justify a substantial difference <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />in right-of-way costs in favor of the Weld County Site. Based on data <br /> <br />furnished by the Assessors of Weld and Morgan counties, the following com- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />parison may be made: <br /> <br />Narrows <br /> <br />Weld County <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Total Area Inundated <br /> <br />2l,787 acres <br /> <br />23,089 acres <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Assessed Valuation of inundated <br />areas <br /> <br />$709,940 <br /> <br />$230,010 <br /> <br />Families in Area <br /> <br />l72 <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We have been informed that the assessments in the two counties <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />are based on approximately the same criteria. It would appear that the <br /> <br />ratio of right-of-way costs for the two projects should be approximately <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />proportional to the ratio, of assessed valuations; i.e. 709,940 + 230,010 <br /> <br />or approximately 3 times greater for Narrows, instead of Weld County being <br /> <br /> <br />slightly higher than Narrows as estimated by the USBR. Also, it appears <br /> <br />that estimates for railroad and highway right-of-way might be subject to <br /> <br />re-evaluation, since length of relocations is greater for the Narrows Site, <br /> <br />and the relocations would traverse more highly developed lands. <br /> <br />b. Hydrology <br /> <br />Flood hydrology for the Projects was reviewed and discussed with <br /> <br />the USBR engineers. It is our opinion that the design floods and spillway <br /> <br />capacities are reasonable. <br /> <br />c. Project Benefits <br /> <br />The USBR Site Selection Report of September 1961, included benefit- <br /> <br />cost studies for the Narrows and Weld County projects. In the discussion of <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.