Laserfiche WebLink
<br />!l ~ 1 '7 l\ 7 Wetland Mitigation <br /> <br />A- /8 <br /> <br />erosion during project operations would be an indication of project effects. At bends, <br />erosion is also expected at non-project flows, so it could be more difficult to isolate <br />project-related erosion. <br /> <br />The "Monitor" sites provide good locations for transects since Sponsors will have to <br />watch them anyway. Results at these sites can be used to clearly identify when and if <br />bank stabilization is needed in the future. Of the 22 Monitor Sites, five are located at <br />relatively straight sections, and the balance on bends. Together with the ten supplemental <br />sites, they should give an excellent overall picture of the river. <br /> <br />The ten supplemental monitoring stations would be identified prior to the commencement <br />of operations. The goal would be to spread them out geographically, and will emphasize <br />areas containing broad flood plains with well-established wetland/riparian wildlife <br />habitat. <br /> <br />Site access will also be a consideration. <br /> <br />A.5.2 <br /> <br />Monitoring Activities. <br /> <br />Transects would extend perpendicularly across the river channel, from flood plain edge to <br />flood plain edge (second geomorphic surface). Cross-section endpoints would be <br />monumented with a metal stake or concrete cap that is easily located and is protected <br />from damage by the river or other activities. River profile would then be surveyed using <br />a tag line and differential level, or similar procedure. The river flow and mid-channel <br />velocity as well as approximate bedload estimates would be noted during monitoring <br />visits, and visual inspections for recent erosion evidence would be made. Increases and <br />decreases in the width of the riparian corridor will be noted. The river cross-section <br />would then be plotted and compared to previous results at the same location. From these <br />efforts, changes in river width, aggradation and degradation can all be identified. If <br />active erosion threatens terraces (particularly at "Monitor Sites"), then this would <br />potentially trigger activation of the site. See Section 2 of the 404 Application, and <br />Section XI-A of the Final Report on Bank Stabilization for additional information on <br />potential activation of Monitor Sites. <br /> <br />A.5.3 <br /> <br />Schedule. <br /> <br />Initial transect development and profile creation would take place before commencement <br />of project operation. After that, cross-sections can be monitored and re-surveyed once <br />per year. Sponsors recommend that the monitoring occur during the late summer or early <br />fall, as this would coincide with transect fieldwork under the Wetlands Monitoring Plan. <br />This is also usually the time of lowest flows, making in-channel survey work safest. <br /> <br />In addition to monitoring cross-sections on a regular, annual basis, Sponsors propose to <br />field-inspect the "Monitor" sites after significant floods, and monthly during the first <br />season of project operation. Landowner communication will also be important. If a bank <br />is eroding into a cultivated field, the farmer is probably going to be the first one to know. <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />AS Lateral Hydropower Project <br /> <br />JVly 21100 <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />:,L~::<~ <br />Ji}...,,,.,';.,",,,<~i~ <br /> <br />" <br />