Laserfiche WebLink
<br />78 <br /> <br />3769 <br /> <br />RUED! DAM AND RESERVOIR, COLO. <br /> <br />diesel, and other fuels equivalent to the highest quality products <br />manufactured from petroleum. <br /> <br />E cOrlOmiC8 <br />Many stateme,uts have been made regarding the competitive position <br />of shale oil products when p~oduced commercially. All are. based on <br />estimates of cost, usually der,,-ed from pllot-p]ant data. Smce shale <br />oil is not produced commercially in this country, there is a certa.m <br />degree of uncertrr.int.y in appraising its economic attractiveness. <br />Careful engineering stndies of the large-scale application of the <br />ne" methods de,'e]oped for oil shale utilization indicate that shale <br />oil ma)' cost no more, and perhaps less, than new domestic petroleum. <br />It is estimated thnt crude shale oil could be produced I1nd sold profit- <br />"bly for 11 wellhel1d price of no more than $2.50 per bl1rrel. By com- <br />parison, the posted prices of Rocky Mountain area crude oils range <br />from $1.81 to $3.10 per barrel. Quality and location determines the <br />price level for a specIfic crude oil. <br />The investment for shale oil production facilities of significant out. <br />put is sizable. A 25,000-barrel-per-day plant may cost from $30 mil- <br />lion to $50 million depending on location, retorting process se]ect"d, <br />find the degree of refining conducted at the productIOn sit e._ In addi- <br />tion, pipelines must be provided to mo,'e the oil either to existing trunk <br />pipelmes or to a market area. <br />'Vhile the minimum investment for economical production cost is <br />high, the unit investment seems reasonable compared with current <br />ex['loration and development costs for petroleum. One estimator <br />(4,) places the investment in new "nd replacement pet,ro]eum produc. <br />tive capacity in the United States between 19.15 and 1960 at $7.500 per <br />daily barrel. Shale oil capacity certainly is less tha,n this figure. <br /> <br />Why no commercial shale oil production.? <br />Since the lifting of 'World War II restrictions, there has been no <br />shortage of petroleum products for the American consumer. Until <br />1948, the Umted States produced more oil than it conslUned and was <br />a net exporter of petroleum and petroleum products. As foreig'n <br />crude oil became available in quantity at low cost, we haye gradually <br />increased imports lmtil, on bala.nce, we are a net importer to the extent <br />of 10 to 20 percent of our petroleum demand. <br />Shale oil is not being produced commercially because there is no <br />nmrket for additional 011 supplies. The Nation",] Petroleum COlmcil <br />est.imates that we now could incren.Re petroleum production from preC\- <br />ent,. sources by at least 2 million barrels per day, were there a market. <br />ThlS production is available with little additional investment, but it <br />cannot compete with foreign imports. <br />9wing to shale oil's large inItial investment and t.he necessity t.o <br />utIlize llew technology~ production on a commereinl basis wiJI begin <br />only when presently deve.loped petroleum product';,:" capacity is being <br />used to. ~he ma.xlIllum practIcal extent and there 1:; protection from <br />c.ompetltlOn by Imported oil. <br /> <br />G-I'owth of th.e shfde j,m1w.;I-I'Y (liteI' 10';',-; <br />'Vhile the water requirements for the expnllsion of the indust.ry <br />a.fter HI75 nre not. eOllsidered in this report, it should not he implied <br />that growt.h will stop at this point. <br />