Laserfiche WebLink
<br />">74 ,; <br />..J 'or <br /> <br />RUEDI D.\....\:I AND RESERVOIR, COLO. <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />All ot,her western-slope costs of t.he dn!l1 and l'e:sen'o~r. are not <br />'se.pnrable t.o the purposes sen-ed a1Ht, therefure, remaIn as ]omt cosh;. <br />A segregation of costs follows: <br /> <br />It0m <br /> <br />Proit'ct <br />C(lsts <br /> <br />Int~r(,5t <br />uUflIlg <br />cuIISt.rUC- <br />tlOn <br /> <br />, AnnlJaln]ll'r- <br />aLion, m"ill- <br />tl'n:lTJc'~. ;t.nd <br />repl:J.Ct'llll'nl <br /> <br />~65, 000 I <br /> <br />$1-1.201l <br />lU,:liJI) <br /> <br />Total costs 10 h{'ullo('atrd.________ ___________ <br />Les,o;scpnmblcrccrc:.LLion ('1)5t5_____.._________.......-_________._ <br />RemaillingjOintcosts___________________._______________1 <br /> <br />$;.,:13].000 <br />55,OOU <br />5. J ili.l~)U I <br /> <br />$2G5,tiOO <br /> <br />3. il~) <br /> <br />The, allocation of costs is based upon a lOO.year period of 'lll<llysis. <br />Benefits and alternative costs for municipal and industrial water <br />supply Rre synonymous. Alternative costs studies for .flood control <br />and fish und wildlife have not been made: therefore, capltali"ed bene- <br />fits constitute the ceiling-s of costs that. may be allocated to t.hese <br />purposes. l-lad n.lternntl\'8 cost estimate" been prepa.red for these <br />purposes, it is likely that the results would have exceeded the beuefits. <br />'The allocation is shown in the next ta.hle. <br /> <br />Cost allocation, RuetH Dam and Rt'8cnoir <br /> <br />[AIl]o)lIl1tSin rlnllarsJ <br /> <br /> I !\-1ullt!'lpal I Flsll alld I Hec"n;:~ <br /> It"m Total :mdioolls- Flood cOlltrol <br /> tri:l! \\'[][rr wil'[We <br /> , <br />Hellen!". '~:lpltalile'L____________ ~l..r;-[,. (lon II, ,,~i". 000 42l.uOO fi,2\18.0110 :.:!.92g,QOO <br />,\ It C'rl1~t j1;"(' l'O~ts_ _ _ _ _u___ _ _ _ ___ l I,S:!i", 0011 Il,!.t!i",IIIIf) ------4~i,-ooij- ----i;~2ii.~:Of,fJ _n__nun__ <br />Jll~tlfi:lhle("llt:mllturc_ ____u_ IR, (IF;,,, .~(U) 11.8:.:!7.00n 143\1,:.00 <br />Sep<llaliJ(I (',,~ts-__ ___n.______ 4:1'1..';')0 ----- ____n_ ____n__un__ _n_u____ 43\1.5rlO <br />Prn!e<'l ('(}~t.~_____ _ _ _ _________ ~i.Q(111 ---------- ~. ~ ---- ------- __.._n___n__ ;:,';'01]11 <br />Interest during ron~tru~II'Jn ----- -------- n _____nnn ___n__un u n -----00--- -------- ----- <br />Oper~tion,H1l1lnl~Tlun(P.n.n<i <br />rt!l'].lt'(!lllcnt,crlJoitJllzcdu_ :J8~, ,~on n ii'-s:i;:,-4illiJ- 00----_---.--- n~ -------- 38cl,[>Ij(J <br />Rp-TlJuinrlt!r___________________.__ 18, 5~6,IlIlO ~2 J. 000 6. ~"!JR. UU(I ------------.. <br />l'ero:nt 'Ii~rrihu!inn___ ___ __n___ l'l\) nO tjJii 0- "' ~.; ----00_----_- <br />1\.eml'.i"il1;! jll~1I\ t'~l~___________ 5, ~ii.l\lO 3,r,~,C, ~\\J l'2\;,rlljl') \,~fJ~,OOO ---- ______u_ <br />f'mjert ro~tS__n___ _ __00_ _ __ [>,lifi,OO() J,3Un,iUII Jli,,)(I(1 1,iSi,8(J() _nn__u__.__ <br />Inleres! durinewnS1Turtlno_ 2(\:i,WO l(j\I,.tnu 6,OIJU 90,200 ------------- <br />Op~r;llinl1,nlaint{'n..ln('c,!l.n,j <br />repl:lc'cownt, (,H:li(:lJJ7t,L__ 135. .~1l0 rilt.1Q{l J, IOU .ff"flOO ---n--4jq'-,~O <br />'TOt~ll:l..110Utlu[)___________.__n. ",Olf:,liOU 3,,';:;6,5QiJ 1211.n!)0 1. 8~4.lln(l <br />i'rc'j",c! ('o~~s_______ _ _ _n____ 5,::!:n,llli(J a,J{,(I,iOO 1\-;',::'IJO 1,';'5/,btll) fo5.flOD <br />IU(Plcstclur/llQCOIlS{TlJctlrlll_ 21,5,1;00 169.-lQO f),OOO 90,20U u ______n__ <br />OI'Pllitloll,lll>ljntcna.n('~,anIJ <br />rephlcemenL, capllulizc'L._ r>::!O,OOI1 !'il). ~u() 3, l'lU 41'.000 3S4.SQO <br />.'\TllltHlloper:.l{\on, lIl:linlemlllce <br />,Ul'i rt'pl:ll'!:'llLeIlL ';osLs_________1 H,200 2,300 I 100 1.30[) I 10.[,00 <br /> <br />I Llmite'J to spedllc costs or rccreuttoo rll~ilities. <br />Repayment analysi~ <br />Under existing poliey, capito,l and annual costs allocated to flood <br />,control and to fish nnd wildlife are nonreimbursable. It is proposed <br />that costs alloc.ated to recreation be nonreimLursahle throl1(rh specific <br />anthorizat.ioll. 'Vestel'u-slope l'eimbul'saLle costs, therefor~, are lim- <br /> <br />