My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08684
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08684
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:49:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:09:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section D General Correspondence-Other Organizations
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
7/1/1972
Author
USWRC
Title
US Water Resources Council - Proposed Principles and Standards - Summary Analysis - Appendices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O()[)5}E <br />OUTPUT CHARACTERISTICS AND BENEFICIARIES <br /> <br />Recreation: <br /> <br />Need to improve measurement <br />of value to users and distribu- <br />tion of benefits. <br /> <br />Other Benefits: <br /> <br />Irrigation, flood control, eco- <br />nomic benefits, navigation <br />benefits versus other forms of <br />transportation. <br /> <br />AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH PRIN'CIPLES AND STANDARDS <br /> <br />Legislative Versus <br />Exec uti ve Authority: <br /> <br />Does Congress or the executive <br />branch have authority to estab- <br />lish Principles and Standards. <br /> <br />IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIN'CIPLES AND STANDARDS <br /> <br />Oppose: <br /> <br />Do not implement the Principles <br />and Standards. Go back to Senate <br />Document 97 or the Task Force <br />Report. <br /> <br />Defer: <br /> <br />Wait until Congressional hear- <br />ings are held. <br /> <br />CRITERIA FOR FORMULATING AND EVALUATIN'G PLANS <br /> <br />OBERS Projections <br />Inadequate: <br /> <br />Demographic and economic <br />pattern projections are <br />inaccurate. <br /> <br />Benefit/Cost Ratio: <br /> <br />Benefit/cost ratio should be <br />reassessed as a criterion and <br />not used exclusively for water <br />development projects. <br /> <br />DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT IN'ADEQUATE <br /> <br />Definition as described in <br />heading. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.