My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08613
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:07:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.950
Description
Section D General Studies - General Water Studies
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/1/1989
Author
John U. Carlson
Title
The Colorado River Compact - A Breeding Ground for International National and Interstate Controversies
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />2. The Boulder Canyon Pro;ect Act of 1928 <br />The Boulder Canyon Project Act of 1928, <br />43 U.S.C. ~ 617 (1928) ("Boulder Canyon Act"), authorized <br />the construction of the Hoover Dam and Powerplant and the <br />All-American Canal between Imperial Dam on the lower <br />river and the Imperial and Coachella Valleys. It also <br />provided that before the 1922 Compact would become <br />effective, all seven states had to ratify it, or that six <br />states, including california, ratify; and that California <br />enact legislation limiting itself to no more than 4.4 <br />m.a.f. of the 7.5 m.a.f. apportioned to the Lower Basin <br />states by Article III(a), plus not more than one-half of <br />the surplus water unapportioned by the 1922 compact. The <br />latter was accomplished in the California Limitation Act <br />of 1929. <br />The Boulder Canyon Act also pre-approved any compact <br />which Arizona, California, and Nevada might enter into <br />apportioning, of the Article III (a) water, 300,000 acre- <br />feet to Nevada, 2.8 m.a.f. to Arizona, and 4.4 m.a.f. or <br />less to California; allowing Arizona exclusive beneficial <br />use of the waters of the Gila River; exempting the Gila <br />River's Arizona tributaries from any obligation to supply <br />water to Mexico under Article III(c); and requiring that <br />any Mexican burden be borne equally by California and <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.