Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:002437 <br /> <br />Each alternative solution was considered using four criteria: <br /> <br /> <br />. Completeness (extent the alternative provides and accounts for all necessary <br /> <br />investments or other actions to ensure the realization of the planned effects) <br /> <br /> <br />. Effectiveness (extent to which the alternative alleviates the problems and achieves <br /> <br />the specified opportunities) <br /> <br /> <br />. Efficie!"'cy (extent to which the alternative is the most cost effective means of <br /> <br />alieviat''1g the specified problems and realizing the specified opportunities) <br /> <br />. Accep~3biHty (extent to which the alternative is acceptable to State, local entities, <br /> <br />and the public). <br /> <br />l'.pponffix-G-ooPtfliA&-ffif~tion for tho various altomati'los Gonoidoroe. 1'. eetailoel <br /> <br />~Bic~4!t"mative-aAalyses arc prooontoe ifl tAIs appom,Ux. I'.Flalysos 'tIero <br /> <br />~(>~l ffref\t-irf~ati<Jn mnnagomont aotivities, a statio irrigation set timo, a <br /> <br /> <br />systerrH::..;,';"cl-01t-Grop needs, nnd n curgo irril'latiefl systOR'l tioel tG GrGf3 nooes. Oata <br /> <br />indic:ltes-!!-oBt-f0il-moisturc deplotion doeo not exooed eO por.cont. TAorofero it was <br /> <br />oonclud:j-fr.em--tl18-AABlycoc thnt deep poreelatieFl Gel,Jle be reeluGoe oignifieantly with <br /> <br />system--rn:n"'lr.m<mt-ffiaAgBs without incroasinl'l Gr-ef3 sensuR'lpti'lo uso I-Ianks (1974) <br /> <br />~itch'-?-f197~~hiB-redUBtion in deep pOFGelatien '.viii roeUGO grEll:Jnd wator <br /> <br />pGIIution-1r(>~"I<>r1ium-and-r\ilfato lenohing, tho f3r-ebloR'l fer WAiGh tho project hao boen <br /> <br />f9ffF\HI8t"d,-Th,,-t0tal--quantity-Bf-AooHlono Rivor water roaGhingtho Kanoao bordor is <br /> <br />flet-.aflt io i(>? t erl-! I)-ChaAQe-wilf\-j:lfeject i rn p I om ontation. <br /> <br />Civil rights isslI"s were considered during alternative formulation. Each of the <br /> <br />alternati'."'s ins" Ided examining the civil rights implications of proposed agency and <br /> <br />project ac~'ons thnt could negatively impact agency employees and decisions related to <br /> <br />02~ <br />