My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08574
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:48:47 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:05:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.100
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Project Description
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1969
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Flood Control Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Eastern Slope Features
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~"f:\.; <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />,,~ '.'~_. <br /> <br />! " ,,"'-:' <br /> <br />L:; ..l.J ,,)' <br />79. Floods also disrupt the irrigation water supply to lands lying <br />outside the flood plain when diversion works are damaged, or when main <br />canals are breached by overbank flow. Since about 90 percent of the <br />land 'irrigated from the Arkansas River between Pueblo and John,Martin <br />Dam lies outside the,flood plain, the adverse effect of floods is thus <br />extended to thousands of acres of,productive land that are not otherwise <br />flood problem areas. Reduction of crop yields due to disruption of the <br />water supply is a function of the length of time diversion facilities <br />are out of operation, crop patterns, and other variables. The degree <br />of damage suffered varies from a minor reduction in yield to ,complete <br />crop failure in extreme cases, Although the condition is mitigated to <br />a degree by irrigation wells ,on many farms, the composite problem and <br />potential loss is significant. <br /> <br />80. Fortunately,,,mos't,urhan development along the river between <br />Pueblo and John Martin Reservoir has generally been on higher ground. <br />A part of North La Junta'including municipal water supply facilities <br />and the city .of La Junta are ,.subject to damage as discussed in para- <br />graph .74. Las Animas is the most vulnerable of the urban developments <br />since it is threatened by even minor floods, and a repetition of a flood <br />of the magnitude of the 1921 flood would cause a major disaster. The <br />serious flood problem at Las Animas will be solved by the construction <br />of the local flood pro,tec.tiDn project authorized by the 1965 Flood Con- <br />trol Act and the Pueblo Dam. <br /> <br />81. FLOOD DAMAGES.- As reported by Follansbee and Jones in Water- <br />Supply Paper No. 487, 1922, the Arkansas River flood or 3-5 June 1921 <br />caused about $20millionc.damage (1921 prices and development), Flood <br />losses were suffered from the town of Florence, about 30 miles upstream <br />from Pueblo, downstream to,:,.the vicinity of the Colorado-Kansas State <br />line. The city'of Pueblo sustained about 50 percent of reported damages <br />including complete loss of ' more than 500 residences, the wrecking of <br />about 100 buildings, and more than 60 buildings washed off foundations. <br />Over 57,000 acres of land "lownstream from Pueblo were flooded. Seventy- <br />eight bodies were recovered'in a short period after the flood, but many <br />were swept downstream to be buried in debris and silt and were never <br />found. <br /> <br />82. The most general and severe flooding since the 1921 flood <br />occurred in May 1955 and June 1965. The latter flood had the greater <br />volume of the two, but peaks at La Junta and Las Animas were not as <br />great as in 1955. Estimated losses from the two floods are tabulated <br />in table 10. <br /> <br />83. Approximately 39,000 acres of land were inundated in May 1955 <br />between Pueblo and John Martin Dam. Of the total, about 8,000 acres <br />were cultivated, 22,000 were in pasture and the remaining 9,000 acres <br />were river channel and wasteland. Urban lands flooded consisted of <br />about 250 acres at La Junta and a few acres in Las Animas. Monetary <br />losses totaled about $2 million, and the loss of two lives was ascribed <br />to the flood. <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.