Laserfiche WebLink
<br />--, <br /> <br />Table ES-l, Summary of Polentiallmpacls of the Execution of the lA, Adoption of the lOP, and Implementation of Biological <br /> <br />m <br />l(l <br />N <br />00 <br /> <br /> Conservation Measures (page 19 of 29) <br />L- Resource/Issue No Action Impacts of Proposed Action/Alternat~ <br /> SOaOECONOMICS <br />The Metropolitan Water District. No new See Colorado River. None. <br />construction or changes in the operation of <br />eXisting iacililies. <br />5cln Die~o County Water Authority. No new See Colorado River. None. <br />construction or changes in the operation of <br />eXisting facilities. <br />Salton Sea. Potential for adverse impacts to Decreased water levels and increased salinity of the Decrease in water levels and decline in water quality <br />population trends and employment from Sea would have negative impacts to the area's would impact the fisheries and other recreational <br />decreased water levels and water quality of the biological and recreational resources, which could resources of the Sea, which may indirectly impacl <br />Salton Sea. adversely impact the local economy. employment opportunities in the area. It could <br /> possibly lead to a reduction in population, <br /> depending on the severity of the impact. This <br /> potential loss of employment opportunities, while <br /> having social consequences, would not constitute a <br /> substantive change to the environment. <br />Inadvertent Overrun Policy <br />Potential for change to population, housing or This alternative would not impact housing or Proposed lOP: Thispolicy would impact <br />socioeconomics from potential payback population. Reclamation would enforce its agricultural uses i~ the liD service area. Payback <br />requirements. obligations under the Decree, which may include measures could include fallowing in the liD service <br /> reduced deliver\es (or those diverters that are area, which could have a sh.on-term impact on <br /> projected to overrun based on their diversion rate agricultural productivity, employment, and revenue <br /> and projected diversions for the remainder of ~e during payback years. Given the comparatively <br /> year, and/or stop deliveries for diverters that are at small amount of water to be paid back, the overall <br /> their entitlement amount. This could result in a impact would be minor. CVWD would likely <br /> short-term reduction in agricultural productivity, reduce its recharge efforts during payback years, <br /> with associated economic impacts, in the lID which would not impact the service area's economy. <br /> service area, the extent of which is dependent upon No aspects of the lOP would impact population or <br /> the amount of water involved. housing. <br /> No Forgiveness Ahernative: Similar to proposed <br /> lOP. <br /> <br />'" <br />>; <br />" <br />Q <br />~ <br />;:;. <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />3 <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />tl <br />'" <br />- <br />V. <br />I <br />-. <br />" <br />" <br />~ <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />Iv <br /><::> <br /><::> <br />Iv <br /> <br />~ <br />a <br />,"> <br />" <br />" <br />... <br />:>:l <br />" <br />;;- <br />~ <br />" <br />... <br />~ <br />... <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />;,. <br />" <br />~ <br /><;. <br />" <br />"' <br />'" <br />- <br />'J> <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />..., <br /> <br />IIiIf' <br /> <br />Bl' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />II!iI'" <br /> <br />I!l!r' <br /> <br />Br" <br /> <br />lID' <br />