Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />6sITION TO THE COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJEXlT, REFUTATION TO <br />'OsITION ARGUMENTS, AND STATEMENTS SUPPORTING THE COLORADO <br />, STORAGE..PROJECT............... ...... 96 <br /> <br />t Price Federal Reclamation," by Raymond Moley . . . . . .. 99 <br />"An Answer to "What Price Federal Reclamation?", L. Vietor Riches 108 <br />". Opposition to the Colorado River Storage Prilject by the <br />Colorado River Board of California. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 121 <br />#Dollars Into Dust," by Leslie A. Miller. . . . . . . . . . .. 125 <br />Answering the Moley, Miller Propaganda Bla.st . . . . . . . . .. 129 <br />The Subsidy Issue Relative to the Colorado River Storage <br />Pi'oject and Participating Projects, by J. J. RaslllUBsen, and <br />C" E. Nelson. " . . . ., .. . CI . . (I . .. . ()' . .. .. It 0 . . " .. 131 <br />The Issue of High Costs Per Acre for Irrigation DevelopJitents <br />. Under the Upper Colorado River Basin Project, by Dr. J. J. <br />Rasmussen .'. to .. 0 () . ., " .. .. .. . .. . . . . " .... ()." . ~ .." 153 <br />Opposition to the Colorado River Storage Project by the <br />Seirra Club 41 . . .. . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. (I . . . . ",. . .. .. 00. 157 <br />Opposition to the Colorado River Storage Project by Gen. u. S. <br />Grant III . .. . . . . . .. " . .. . .. . e" . .- . . oJ' 0 ., . . . .. 159 <br />"Present and Future Quality of Colorado River Water at Lee's <br />Ferry," by John H. Bliss. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .- . . (J .. .'... .... 160 <br />Factors Affecting Quality of Water. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 160 <br />Dissolved Constituents and Their Significance . . . . . . .. 165 <br />Effect of Initial Phase Depletions. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. 166 <br />Effect of Ultimate Depletions . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. 167 <br />Base Exchange and SodiUIII Percentage . . . . . . . . . .' . .. 167 <br />LOsses From Solution in Large Reservoirs. . . . . . . . . .. 168 <br />The Upper Colorado River Project and the Compact of 1922~ .. 169 <br />Effects of Holdover Storage on Quality of Wa~er . . . . . .. 171 <br />The Case of the Upper Colorado Storage Project, by Geo. D. <br />Cly'de 0 0' (J," () 0' .. " .. .. .. . . <II .. . . . . .. .. .. & to '" ,) It ... 173 <br />Answers to the Opposition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 180 <br />The Echo Park Question. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 180 <br />Opponents Know the Facts, by Sen. Arthu;r V. Watkins. . . .. 182 <br />Card Stacking and Echo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 183 <br />C. I~ O. Statement . . ~ . . 0 .. . If . . . .. " " " .. () . f> " 0..' 185, <br />President Eisenhower's Statement of Support for the Project. .. 186 <br />Partnership Can Get the Job Done, by Ten Private Utility Co. .. 187 <br />Partner'ship 0 0 " 0- II " (J .. II (} .. . . .. .. .. .. ~ .. 0 0 . (} . 0. 187 <br />Why Are the Utilities Interested? . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 187 <br />What is the Basis for the Proposed Partnership? . . . . . .. 189 <br />New Jersey Senator StUlllps for Colorado River Storage Plan, . .. 192 <br />The Basio Points to Remember . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. 193 <br />Total Cost. " " . 0 " ... " " " . .. .. .. " .. .. " " ., . " . . .. 0 193 <br />Irrigation Costs 0 0 .. " " " " .. " .. .. " " .. " .. .. 0 " " " "(I 193 <br />To Be Repaid. 0 . 0 " " " 0 .. " .. " It II (1 " . " 0 " " ~ .. "0- 194 <br />The Project is Needed " 0 .. " . .. . " " " . . " " " (} " .. ... 194 <br />Honest Questions for Honest Men. . . . . . . , . . , . . . . .. 195 <br /> <br />BIBLIOGRAPHY. . <br /> <br />.. 0 0 .. . <br /> <br />197 <br /> <br />. . . <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. . . <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. . . <br /> <br />. . II .. .. <br /> <br />.. .. . " <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />-V1- <br />