My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_2717593
DWR
>
Dam Safety
>
2015
>
03
>
DWR_2717593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2017 11:09:13 AM
Creation date
3/3/2015 11:31:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Dam Safety
Document Date
2/27/2015
Document Type - Dam Safety
Report
Division
5
Dam ID
040110
Subject
CARRIAGE HILLS #2 (LOWER) DAM - FAILURE FORENSIC REPORT REVISED
DWR Send/Recipient
DSB
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CARRIAGE HILLS NO. 2 DAM, Dam Failure Forensic Investigation Report Page 3 <br />February 27, 2015 <br /> <br />Figure 3: 2011 NAIP areal image showing the Carriage Hills No.2 Dam and surroundings. <br />The DSB was notified by phone on the morning of Sept. 12, 2013, by the Town of Estes Park water manager that <br />the Carriage Hills dams were overtopping by flood flows. The Dam Safety Engineer (DSE) assigned to the dam <br />made a follow‐up call to the Town’s public works director and understood the Town was taking emergency <br />action to evacuate downstream residents along Fish Creek. The DSB subsequently lost all communication with <br />Estes Park for the duration of the flood and for some time thereafter. A DSE made it to Estes Park on Sept. 19, <br />2013, and confirmed that the Carriage Hills No. 2 (lower) Dam had failed. Carriage Hills No. 1 (upper) Dam <br />sustained damage from overtopping but did not fail. <br /> <br />4. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS: The DSB performed the following field investigations of the Carriage Hills No. <br />2 Dam failure and surrounding flooding: <br /> <br />Sept. 19, 2013: Just under a week after the dam failure, the DSB visited the site as part of on‐going flood <br />emergency response. The main purpose of this visit was to document conditions at the breach and the dam site <br />for forensic purposes and to ensure the dam was in a safe condition. <br />Sept. 26, 2013: As our immediate emergency response effort slowed a crew of two DSEs returned to the site to <br />perform a detailed survey of the dam and talk to eyewitnesses. Table 1 shows results from our level survey of <br />the dam, breach, and spillway. Figure 4 shows a profile of our survey. Photos 1‐14 show conditions <br />encountered during the investigation. We made the following visual classifications of soils in the right breach <br />side slope (see Photo 5 of the soil profile at the breach): <br />0’‐1.4’: organic soil <br />1.4’‐2.4’: light‐colored sandy clay, very stiff <br />2.4’‐2.6’: clayey sand with gravel <br />2.6’‐ 6.0’ (bottom of breach at sample location): dark colored sandy, gravely clay with organics <br /> Bag samples were collected from the embankment, but no lab testing was performed as part of this study. <br />Carriage Hills No. 2 Dam
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.