My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
DWR_2952033
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2016
>
08
>
DWR_2952033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2021 4:58:37 PM
Creation date
8/31/2016 1:25:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2 AUGUST 2016
Author/Source
AECOM
Keywords
RISKS OF AGING DAMS, HYDROLOGIC INADEQUACIES, INTERNAL EROSION
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
8/31/2016
Year
2016
Team/Office
Dam Safety
Tags
DWR Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed on or after 10/6/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Western Dam Engineering <br /> Technical Note <br /> <br /> August 2016 <br /> <br />22 <br /> Figure 19. Sinkhole in crest of a dam in Montana that <br />manifested after several years of undetected internal <br />erosion into a damaged conduit [6] <br />Conditions for Initiation of Internal <br />Erosion <br />For internal erosion to initiate, certain conditions need <br />to exist within the dam. The material properties, <br />hydraulic load, and critical stress conditions all play a <br />part in the initiation, continuation, and progressions. <br />Figure 20 below summarizes how different factors <br />contribute to conditions for internal erosion to occur. <br />Material Properties <br />The erodibility of a soil is the major factor in the <br />probability of internal erosion occurring and is a <br />function of material properties including particle size, <br />plasticity and gradation. Cohesionless materials (low <br />plasticity) such as sands and silts are more likely to <br />erode than those with cohesion (such as clays) as the <br />particles have fewer internal forces keeping the <br />particles together. <br />Fine-grained sand and silt particles are more likely to <br />erode than larger, coarse particles (as in coarser sands <br />and gravels, cobbles, and boulders) because it takes <br />more energy (seepage velocity) to move larger, heavier <br />particles. The gradation distribution of a material is <br />also important as a well-graded material may provide <br />its own filtering in that the larger materials provide the <br />weight needed to counteract movement, while the <br />smaller materials fill voids and reduce permeability and <br />therefore, seepage velocity. More uniformly graded <br />soils are therefore more susceptible to erosion than <br />well-graded soils. <br />Broadly-graded soil (soils with a wide range of particle <br />sizes; e.g. ranging from cobble to silt sizes) can be <br />susceptible to internal instability (suffusion or <br />suffosion). This is particularly true when the gradation <br />distribution lacks certain particle sizes, known as gap- <br />graded soils. In these soils, the coarser fraction of the <br />soil is too large to filter the finer fraction. <br />Table 2. Internal Erosion Potential of Soils <br />(Adapted from [4]) <br />Greatest Piping <br />Resistance Category (1) <br />1. Plastic clay (PI>15), Well compacted <br />2. Plastic clay (PI>15), Poorly compacted <br />Intermediate Piping <br />Resistance Category (2) <br />3. Well-graded material with clay binder <br />(6<PI<15), Well compacted <br />4. Well-graded material with clay binder <br />(6<PI<15), Poorly compacted <br />5. Well-graded cohesionless material (PI<6), <br />Well compacted <br />Least Piping Resistance <br />Category (3) <br />6. Well-graded cohesionless material (PI <6), <br />Poorly compacted <br />7. Very uniform, fine cohesionless sand (PI<6), <br />Well compacted <br />8. Very uniform fine cohesionless sand (PI<6), <br />Poorly compacted <br />Note: Dispersive soils may be less resistant than Category 3. <br />Hydraulic Load <br />Hydraulic gradients and seepage velocities are also key <br />factors in determining the potential of internal erosion. <br />For simplicity, average (horizontal) gradients along the <br />entire suspected internal erosion pathway are usually <br />estimated to evaluate the potential for internal erosion <br />to occur, as it is difficult to measure in the field. <br />Several researchers have measured erosion potential <br />in the past and determined gradients at which certain <br />soils may erode. However, conditions in the field <br />contain many more uncertainties than laboratory <br />environments used for testing, and BEP has been <br />estimated to occur with gradients less than 0.05. Based <br />on laboratory testing, the initiating gradient to erode <br />sands is a function of the gradation, with poorly (more <br />uniformly) graded sands being more susceptible to <br />erosion at lower gradients than well graded soils. <br />Upward, or vertical, gradients can be estimated in <br />cases where a confining layer exists at the downstream <br />exit point. The vertical gradients relate to the potential <br />for heave or uplift to initiate erosion at the exit point <br />and are impacted by the properties and thickness of <br />the confining layer. (See the previous Tech Note article “IS <br />YOUR EMBANKMENT DAM UNDER PRESSURE - UNDERSEEPAGE <br />IMPACTS“)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.