My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
DWR_2951354
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2016
>
08
>
DWR_2951354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 11:33:05 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 1:39:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1, MAY 2016
Author/Source
AECOM
Keywords
CIPP, EMBANKMENT, DAM, APPS, ENGINEER, SEEPAGE
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
5/31/2016
Year
2016
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Western Dam Engineering <br /> Technical Note <br /> <br /> May 2016 <br /> <br />20 <br />Internal erosion has led to more catastrophic dam <br />failures than any other mechanism except <br />overtopping. Internal erosion is itself a broad category, <br />as it encompasses several mechanisms including <br />backward erosion piping, concentrated leak erosion, <br />contact erosion, and suffusion/suffosion. Describing all <br />of the initiating, continuation, and progression <br />mechanics of internal erosion is beyond the practical <br />scope of this article. Three excellent references for <br />further reading on internal erosion mechanisms are <br />[2], [4] and [9]. Look for a summary of internal erosion <br />mechanisms and associated potential failure modes in <br />a future article. <br />Foundation Seepage and Backward Erosion Piping <br />The focus of this article is specifically on seepage <br />through a dam’s foundation and its impact on dam <br />safety. Seepage through the foundation of an <br />embankment dam is sometimes referred to as <br />“underseepage.” Internal erosion through the <br />foundation due to underseepage is especially <br />dangerous because there may be only subtle evidence <br />that it is taking place until the situation has progressed <br />to near failure. This is because the exit point may not <br />be readily visible, as it could be a distance downstream <br />of the dam, be underwater, or be hidden by terrain <br />and/or vegetation and be undetectable to the casual <br />observer. <br />Underseepage is controlled by the natural conditions <br />of the foundation and any engineered features in the <br />design and preparation of the foundation. Engineered <br />features for foundation preparation may include <br />removal of unsuitable soils (organic, low strength, <br />permeable, etc.), in-situ soil improvements (dynamic <br />compaction, deep soil mixing, etc.), cutoff walls and <br />trenches, surface treatment of bedrock contact, and <br />grouting. Foundation treatment was often limited or <br />absent for small to medium sized dams, especially <br />those constructed before about 1970, as a result of not <br />fully understanding or recognizing the potential <br />adverse impacts of seepage flow through, into, or out <br />of the foundation. <br />Backward Erosion Piping <br />Although there are several internal erosion <br />mechanisms that can occur through the foundation, <br />the most common is known as backward erosion <br />piping, or just “piping.” Backward erosion piping is <br />erosion of soil by seepage water that initiates at an exit <br />point and progresses backward (upstream) toward the <br />reservoir (generally in a horizontal direction as shown <br />on Figure 1). Particles of soil are carried away by the <br />seepage, until eventually a tunnel, or pipe, is formed <br />from the downstream exit point to the reservoir. A <br />continuous layer susceptible to piping, beneath a layer <br />or structure capable of forming a roof, is needed for <br />backward erosion piping to lead to dam failure. In <br />addition, an unfiltered exit point is required for this <br />type of erosion to initiate. <br />The typical series of events to describe the mode of <br />failure from initiation to complete breach, known as an <br />event tree, has been developed and is generally <br />described as follows [9]: <br />1. Reservoir at or above threshold level <br />2. Initiation – Erosion starts <br />3. Continuation – Unfiltered or inadequately filtered <br />exit exists <br />4. Progression – Continuous stable roof and/or <br />sidewalls <br />5. Progression – Constriction or upstream zone fails <br />to limit flows <br />6. Progression – No self-healing by upstream zone <br />7. Unsuccessful detection and intervention <br />8. Dam breaches <br />There are two idealized foundation conditions most <br />commonly considered when evaluating the potential <br />for excessive foundation seepage. McCook [5] and <br />Pabst et. al [6] are two excellent references that <br />provide understandable and concise descriptions of <br />these two conditions and methods to estimate factors <br />of safety against the initiation of erosion. <br />The terms ‘heave’ and ‘uplift and blowout’ are <br />sometimes used interchangeably; however, as <br />described below, the mechanisms are physically <br />different. The use of ‘heave’ should be limited to <br />cohesionless soils (no confining layer) and the use of <br />‘uplift and blowout’ to foundations with a confining <br />layer. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.