My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_2951354
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2016
>
08
>
DWR_2951354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 11:33:05 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 1:39:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1, MAY 2016
Author/Source
AECOM
Keywords
CIPP, EMBANKMENT, DAM, APPS, ENGINEER, SEEPAGE
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
5/31/2016
Year
2016
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Western Dam Engineering <br /> Technical Note <br /> <br /> May 2016 <br /> <br />16 <br />Case Studies <br />Project 1 <br />CIPP was used on one project to rehabilitate an old <br />bituminous coated 48-inch corrugated metal pipe <br />(CMP). The downstream portion of the old CMP was <br />replaced with a new reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) <br />and the upstream portion of the old CMP was slip lined <br />with CIPP. The CIPP was installed through an access <br />point at the gate tower and cured with circulating hot <br />water. <br /> <br /> Figure 5 – CIPP installed through gate tower (White <br />pipe is the CIPP and black pipe is used to circulate hot <br />water for curing) <br /> <br />After installation and curing was complete, it was <br />noticed that the CIPP did not fit tightly against the <br />existing CMP and there were gaps between the two <br />pipes. Portions of annular space between the CIPP and <br />the old CMP had to be grouted to fill these gaps. The <br />problems with this installation were thought to be <br />caused by the larger size of the original pipe (48-inch) <br />and the distance from the CIPP manufacturing point to <br />the project site. It was speculated that because of the <br />long travel distance to the site, the CIPP began to cure <br />enroute. <br /> <br /> Figure 6 – Loose-fitting CIPP against Old CMP. <br />(Portions of the pipeline had to be grouted.) <br /> <br />Project 2 <br />In this case, CIPP lining was used to rehabilitate a 24- <br />inch CMP successfully. The CIPP fit tightly to the <br />existing CMP and no issues were noted. The difference <br />between the two projects was that Project 2 had a <br />smaller diameter pipe and the project site was close to <br />the manufacturing location. <br /> <br /> Figure 7 – CIPP Being Installed to Rehabilitate 24-inch <br />CMP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.