My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_2810347
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2015
>
10
>
DWR_2810347
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2015 11:23:46 AM
Creation date
10/27/2015 10:33:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
SEO FORUM: COLORADO RIVER COMPACT OPERATIONS, ADMINISTRATION, AND COMPLIANCE
Author/Source
JAMES EKLUND, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keywords
OPERATIONS, ADMINISTRATION, COMPLIANCE, LAW, COMPACT, COLORADO, HYDROLOGY, CONSUMPTIVE USE
Document Type - Reference Library
Presentations
Document Date
10/31/2007
Year
2007
Team/Office
Denver Office
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
2 <br />II. Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. Negotiated in 1948 by representatives of <br />Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and the federal government, approved in <br />1949. Article I(b) recognizes that "the Colorado River Compact is in full force and effect <br />and all of the provisions hereof are subject thereto." <br /> <br />Apportionment provisions: <br /> <br />Article III(a): "Subject to the provisions and limitations contained in the Colorado River <br />Compact," Article III(a) apportions "in perpetuity" the Upper Basin's share of the consumptive <br />use of water under the Colorado River Compact to individual states. Arizona gets a flat 50,000 <br />AF off the top. The rest is apportioned by percentages: <br /> <br />State % % of 7.5 MAF <br />(full supply) <br />% of 6 MAF <br />(more likely <br />supply) <br />Colorado 51.75 3,855,375 3,079,125 <br />New Mexico 11.25 838,125 669,375 <br />Utah 23 1,713,500 1,368,500 <br />Wyoming 14 1,043,000 833,000 <br /> <br />Article III(b) specifies that the III(a) apportionments "shall be applied in conformity with the <br />following principles:" <br />"(1) The apportionment is of any and all man-made depletions; <br />"(2) Beneficial use is the basis, the measure and the limit of the right to use; <br />"(3) No state shall exceed the apportioned use in any water year when the effect of such <br />excess use, as determined by the commission, is to deprive another signatory state of its <br />apportioned use during the water year; provided, that this subparagraph (b)(3) shall not <br />be construed as: <br />"(i) Altering the apportionment of use, or obligations to make deliveries as <br />provided in article XI, XII, XIII or XIV of this compact; <br />"(ii) Purporting to apportion among the signatory states of such uses of water as <br />the upper basin may be entitled to under paragraphs (f) and (g) of article III of the <br />Colorado River Compact; or <br />"(iii) Countenancing average uses by any signatory state in excess of its <br />apportionment. <br />"(4) The apportionment to each state includes all water necessary for the supply of any <br />rights which now exist." <br /> <br />Curtailment provisions: <br /> <br />Article VIII creates the Upper Colorado River Commission. Article IV specifies that, in the <br />event curtailment of Upper Basin water use becomes necessary, the extent of curtailment by each <br />state "shall be in such quantities and at such times as shall be determined by the commission <br />upon the application of the following principles:" <br /> <br />Article IV(b): "If any state or states of the upper division, in the ten years immediately
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.