Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />December 13, 2013 <br />Issues with Selecting an Appropriate Crop Growth Stage Coefficient for the SCS Mod. Blaney-Criddle Eqn. <br />Page 20 of 34 <br /> <br />PART III: EVALUATION OF TASK MEMO 59.1 <br /> <br />Background: <br />Task Memo 59.1 presented a methodology for calibrating the SCS Modified Blaney-Criddle equation to <br />the ASCE Standardized Reference ET Equation28 (herein referred to as “The ASCE”). This methodology <br />will often increase the historical consumptive use of a water right when compared to TR-21. An analysis <br />using data from Kersey, CO was performed to show how applicable the upper plains coefficients for <br />pasture grasses are to a specific site, such as in a change of use analysis. This evaluation also <br />compares the findings of Task Memo 59.1 to those of Pochop using an elevation adjustment, and <br />published Blaney-Criddle coefficients from ARS 1275. In addition, an independent calibration was <br />performed in attempt to duplicate the results of Task Memo 59.1. <br /> <br />The upper plains coefficients were developed by calibrating the SCS modified Blaney-Criddle equation to <br />The ASCE. The two equations were solved independently for a given month using CoAgMET data from <br />the same climate station. The kc value was determined by dividing The ASCE results by the SCS TR-21 <br />results. The resulting factor was then applied to the kc value and the process was repeated. A summary <br />of the input data for the analysis is provided below. <br /> <br /> SCS TR-21 Blaney-Criddle ASCE Stnd. Ref. ET Equation <br />Type of Climate data (1993 - 2003) Monthly29 Daily <br />Source of crop (growth stage) coefficients TR-21 Table 6.9 of Manual 70 30 <br />Loc. where coefficients were developed (unknown, varied) Kimberly, ID <br />Growing season parameters TR-21 TR-21 <br />Reference Crop N/A Tall (f/k/a, alfalfa) <br /> Table 16 – Input data for calibration procedure in Task Memo 59.1 <br /> <br />It is important to note that Manual 70 references the ASCE Penman-Monteith Equation for ET and Table <br />6.9 has not been adjusted for use with The ASCE. A small adjustment should be made to these <br />coefficients before using them with The ASCE. This adjustment has been done by Dr. Richard Allen and <br />can be found in Chapter 8, Irrigation Requirements of Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems31 <br />(herein referred to as “Chapter 8”). <br /> <br />The SPDSS defines the upper plains region as District 1, 2, and the lower portions (below 6500’ <br />elevation) of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. However, the upper plains coefficients really represent an average of <br />Ft Collins, Ft Lupton, and Greeley since that is where the data came from. Climate data from these three <br />locations were used to develop independent coefficients, which were then averaged. Ft Collins and <br />Greeley are located in District 3 and Ft Lupton is located in District 2. No data from Districts 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, <br />8, or 9 were considered. <br /> <br />The upper plains coefficients may have been adequate for the basin-wide planning that the CWCB was <br />involved in, but may not represent a particular site within the upper plains basin. Since the data used was <br />from Ft Collins, Ft Lupton, and Greeley the results may only accurately represent that area in a site <br />specific analysis. An example of this can be seen when evaluating pasture grass in Kersey, CO. <br /> <br />Kersey Analysis (pasture grasses): <br />Kersey is located approximately 10 miles east-southeast of Greeley, CO. Climate data from CoAgMET <br />(KSY01) were used to calculate monthly consumptive use of pasture grasses using the SCS modified <br />Blaney-Criddle equation with TR-21 coefficients, the ASCE Standardized Equation, and SCS modified <br />Blaney-Criddle equation with the upper plains coefficients from Task Memo 59.1. The monthly results <br />were plotted from 1993 to 2008 and show that for pasture grasses in Kersey, CO the upper plains <br />coefficients over estimate consumptive use when compared to the ASCE method and SCS TR-21 <br />method. Kersey, CO may not be represented well by Ft Collins, Ft Lupton, or Greeley climate data. <br /> <br />28 Allen, et al. (2005) 29 Average monthly temperature was calculated from daily max & min temperature 30 Reported mean crop coefficients were used 31 Allen, et al. (2007)