Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />December 13, 2013 <br />Issues with Selecting an Appropriate Crop Growth Stage Coefficient for the SCS Mod. Blaney <br />Page 16 of 34 <br /> <br />The data from ARS 1275 do not show any <br />it is probable that other data were considered in the development of SCS TR <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 15 - kc vs. month for winter wheat <br /> <br />Small Grain. The SCS TR-21 coefficients for small grain were compared to two data set <br />The data sets from ARS 1275 represent <br />elevation of 3,091 feet above sea level. The data from ARS 1275 did not show a strong relationship (R <br />0.857), as shown in Chart 12, to TR <br />this data in part, or not at all. <br /> <br />Figure 16 - kc vs. month for B <br /> <br />Orchards. The SCS TR-21 coefficients for orchards were compared to ten data sets in ARS 1275. The <br />data sets from ARS 1275 represent “Deciduous Fruit,” lemons, grapefruit, orange, and walnut trees. TR <br />21 provided two curves for orchards, one with “ground cover” and <br />mention of what type of ground cover, whether it is grass, alfalfa, or another <br />common. Similarly, the ARS 1275 is not clear on what was meant by “deciduous fruit.” <br />1275 were reported from the following locations: <br /> <br />0.0 <br />0.5 <br />1.0 <br />1.5 <br />2.0 <br />2.5 <br />3.0 <br />0 2 <br />0.0 <br />0.2 <br />0.4 <br />0.6 <br />0.8 <br />1.0 <br />1.2 <br />1.4 <br />3 4 <br />Issues with Selecting an Appropriate Crop Growth Stage Coefficient for the SCS Mod. Blaney-Criddle Eqn. <br />not show any correlation to TR-21, as shown in Chart 11, <br />other data were considered in the development of SCS TR-21 coefficients. <br />vs. month for winter wheat <br />21 coefficients for small grain were compared to two data set <br />represent barley in Mandan, ND and Logan, UT reflect an <br />feet above sea level. The data from ARS 1275 did not show a strong relationship (R <br />to TR-21 and may suggest that the TR-21 coefficients could have relied on <br />vs. month for Barley <br />21 coefficients for orchards were compared to ten data sets in ARS 1275. The <br />data sets from ARS 1275 represent “Deciduous Fruit,” lemons, grapefruit, orange, and walnut trees. TR <br />21 provided two curves for orchards, one with “ground cover” and one without. The SCS provides no <br />mention of what type of ground cover, whether it is grass, alfalfa, or another legume <br />Similarly, the ARS 1275 is not clear on what was meant by “deciduous fruit.” <br />ed from the following locations: <br />4 6 8 10 <br />Phoenix <br />Garden City <br />Bushland <br />Average <br />SCS TR-21, Wheat <br />5 6 7 8 <br />Mandan, ND <br />Logan, UT <br />Average of ARS 1275 <br />SCS TR-21, small grains <br />Criddle Eqn. <br />, and suggests that <br />21 coefficients. <br /> <br />21 coefficients for small grain were compared to two data sets in ARS 1275. <br />reflect an average <br />feet above sea level. The data from ARS 1275 did not show a strong relationship (R2 = <br />21 coefficients could have relied on <br /> <br />21 coefficients for orchards were compared to ten data sets in ARS 1275. The <br />data sets from ARS 1275 represent “Deciduous Fruit,” lemons, grapefruit, orange, and walnut trees. TR- <br />one without. The SCS provides no <br />legume; all of which are <br />Similarly, the ARS 1275 is not clear on what was meant by “deciduous fruit.” Data from ARS <br />12 <br />9