My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
DWR_2802486
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2015
>
10
>
DWR_2802486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2018 3:02:29 PM
Creation date
10/7/2015 10:29:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 3, ISSUE 3, JULY 2015
Author/Source
AECOM
Keywords
SPILLWAYS, DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR OUTLET CONTROL, INSTRUMENTATION FOR SMALL EARTH DAMS
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
7/31/2015
Year
2015
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />20 <br /> What method should be used for collecting <br />data? <br /> What threshold level should be established for <br />each instrument as a guideline for recognizing <br />an usual reading? <br />Answers to these questions will guide the decision to <br />which instrument is best suited for the job. Selecting <br />the right instrument includes having an idea on the <br />known parameter. Do I need a 90-degree v-notch weir <br />or a parshall flume? Should my piezometer be an open <br />standpipe or a nest of fully grouted vibrating wires? <br />The following table is one example that can be used in <br />selecting the right instrument. This assessment is <br />recommended to insure selection of the correct <br />instrument to serve the required purpose. Note that <br />the examples shown in the table are for illustration <br />purposes only; actual information and <br />recommendations would be very site specific <br />depending on the potential deficiency and site specific <br />conditions of the dam. <br />Table 1: Instrument Planning Table <br />Problem / <br />Deficiency / <br />PFM <br />What <br />information/parameter <br />does the Instrument <br />need to provide? <br />At what location is <br />the parameter best <br />measured? (e.g. <br />where is the source <br />of water?) <br />Construction <br />Recommendation <br />Potential <br />Problems with <br />Installation <br />Reading Method and <br />Frequency1 <br />Example: <br />Saturated <br />foundation, dry <br />embankment <br />Are foundation uplift <br />pressures present? <br />Is a confining layer <br />present? If so, how <br />extensive? <br />Fractured bedrock <br />Water present at <br />approximately 20 ft <br />deep in boreholes <br />2 piezometers in <br />same 6" borehole <br />1 in fractured <br />bedrock <br />1 in presumed cap <br />layer <br />Isolating strata, <br />can bedrock be <br />augered through? <br />Manually read with <br />water probe, <br />monthly <br />Example: <br />Seepage <br />observed at <br />downstream <br />toe <br />Flow rate of seepage <br />Is sediment present within <br />the flow? <br />What is the relationship or <br />time lag with pool level – <br />does it stop or increase at <br />different pool levels? <br />Collect seepage at a <br />location near <br />downstream toe <br />90o v-notch weir <br />Collect into an <br />upstream basin to <br />monitor for <br />sediment <br />Install water level <br />gauge <br />Collect and <br />convey seepage to <br />single point, <br />avoid seepage <br />bypassing weir. <br />limit adjacent <br />runon if possible <br />Manually read water <br />level and convert to <br />flow (gpm), <br />monthly <br />1. Record reservoir level and recent precipitation at every reading <br />Implementation (Overview of Design <br />Considerations) <br />Key design considerations when implementing a <br />monitoring program include: <br /> Instrument Location <br /> Instrument Design <br /> Installation and Protection <br />The following are some considerations for picking the <br />best instrument location. Limiting impacts of the <br />existing structure should be considered when selecting <br />the preferred location. For example, in order to <br />monitor the phreatic level within the foundation, is it <br />necessary to drill the piezometer through the <br />embankment or can it be installed at the toe? <br />The location should consider both the existing <br />conditions as well as the post-installation conditions. <br />For example, toe drain outlets that look great during <br />installation, may become inundated over time if <br />installed in a location that does not allow positive <br />drainage. <br />The ability to measure the instrument should be <br />considered when selecting the installation location. <br />Can you get a bucket underneath the outlet pipe to <br />measure outflow using the timed-bucket method? <br />Staff gauges need to be easily visible from the shore, <br />and within calm water, far enough away from any <br />water intake gate, channel, weir or flume to avoid <br />inaccurate readings due to drawdown effects. A staff <br />gauge should be placed in a sheltered area that is not <br />influenced by wave action or susceptible to ice <br />damage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.