Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />13 <br />Flow under these conditions is fully pressurized and a <br />stage-discharge relationship can be developed based <br />on Bernoulli’s Equation where discharge, 𝑄, is <br />computed as follows: <br />𝑄=π‘ŽοΏ½2𝑔𝐻𝑇𝐾𝐿 <br />where π‘Ž is the flow area, 𝑔 is the gravitational <br />acceleration, 𝐻𝑇 is the total head needed to overcome <br />various losses to produce discharge, and 𝐾𝐿 is a <br />function of the head losses associated with trash racks, <br />gates, valves, bends, transitions, friction and exit <br />losses. See References [9] and [10], for more <br />information. <br />The stage-discharge relationship for the entire outlet <br />works system is based on the minimum discharge of <br />the inlet and outlet control relationships (see Figure 1). <br />There are a number of commercial computer modeling <br />tools available for evaluating outlet works hydraulics, <br />but spreadsheets are commonly used for simple <br />systems. See Reference [9] for more information. <br /> <br />Figure 1: Combined stage-discharge curve of an outlet works <br />Tailwater Effects – It is possible for tailwater in the <br />downstream channel to impact the outlet works flow <br />hydraulics, especially at high flow rates. For open <br />channel flow systems, it is important to ensure the <br />tailwater does not submerge the outlet and create <br />mixed flow conditions within the outlet conduit. For <br />pressurized systems, submergence of the outlet is <br />acceptable; however, it reduces the capacity and must <br />be considered in the analysis. For energy dissipation <br />purposes, tailwater can be beneficial and may <br />potentially reduce the required size of the energy <br />dissipation structure. <br />For simple downstream channel geometries, tailwater <br />rating curves can be developed using Manning’s <br />equation. For more complicated geometries, it may be <br />necessary to model the tailwater using a program such <br />as HEC-RAS. <br />Cavitation and Venting – As flow passes through a <br />gate or valve, the contraction produces separation <br />downstream in which negative pressures may develop. <br />When the pressure in the flow drops below the vapor <br />pressure, cavitation, which is the formation of vapor <br />bubbles within the water, may develop, causing <br />damage to the control structures or conduits. When <br />the water is subjected to higher pressures again, the <br />bubbles implode, generating intense shock waves that <br />can be extremely damaging to the outlet conduit. To <br />maintain positive pressures in the flow, it is necessary <br />to vent the region immediately downstream of a gate <br />or valve located within the outlet conduit (See Figure <br />2). Vents typically consist of a pipe located within the <br />embankment of the dam with an outlet near the dam <br />crest. Vents must be sized appropriately to allow <br />adequate airflow. See References [1], [7], and [14] and <br />our previous article Design Considerations for Outlet <br />Works Air Vents (Vol. 1 Issue 2) for more information. <br /> <br />Figure 2: Air vent downstream of a slide gate <br />Hydrologic Considerations <br />The design flow rates for the outlet works are dictated <br />by a variety of factors including downstream needs, <br />storage considerations, power generation <br />requirements, reservoir depletion requirements, and <br />legal requirements. For outlet works that act as the <br />only spillway, the capacity should be sufficient to pass <br />the inflow design flood (IDF). A discussion about flood <br />inflows was presented in Turning Rainfall to Runoff <br />(Vol. 2 Issue 1). <br />The outlet works design capacity for most low-level <br />outlets is driven by the time required to drain the