Laserfiche WebLink
Western Dam Engineering <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8 <br />Table 1 – Summary of Characterization, Test Methods, and Sample Types for Key Soil Properties <br />Soil Property / Design <br />Aspect Characterization and Design Considerations Key Testing Methods Sample Type for <br />Laboratory Testing <br />Shear Strength <br /> (ϕ – friction angle) <br /> (c- cohesion) <br /> Influenced by soil type, in-situ dry unit weight, <br />degree of saturation, pore water pressure, <br />degree of compaction, plasticity, cementation, <br />seismic loading, weathering. <br /> Consists of frictional and cohesion components <br /> Estimated from in situ field tests, gradation data, <br />density, Atterberg limits, and drained and <br />undrained strengths from lab tests. <br /> Strength considerations for slope stability <br />analyses are discussed in Vol. 1, Issue 3 (Nov <br />2013) newsletter. <br />In Situ (Field): standard <br />penetration test, vane <br />shear test, cone <br />penetration test, pocket <br />penetrometer <br />Laboratory: direct shear <br />(DS), triaxial shear (TS), <br />unconfined compression <br />(UC) tests <br />Undisturbed1 sample <br />needed for DS, TS, or <br />UC tests. Remolded2 <br />sample used for <br />testing proposed new <br />embankment fill. <br />Permeability (k) <br /> Influenced by soil type, fines content, degree of <br />compaction, cracking; and joints, fractures and <br />weathering in rock. <br /> For analyses & design often need embankment, <br />foundation, and filter material “k” values. <br /> Anisotropy: horizontal “k” can be up to 1000 <br />times greater than vertical “k”. <br />In Situ: pressure (packer) <br />test, constant/falling/rising <br />head tests, pump tests <br />Laboratory: Falling head, <br />constant head, and back <br />pressure permeability <br />tests performed in triaxial <br />cell. <br />Undisturbed1 or <br />remolded2 sample <br />used for back pressure <br />permeability test, <br />falling / constant head <br />tests. <br />Protective Filters <br /> Gradation data and permeability estimates <br />needed for base and filter materials. <br /> Filter design discussed in Vol. 1, Issue 1 (March <br />2013) newsletter. <br />Laboratory: sieve <br />analysis, hydrometer (to <br />estimate fines fraction); <br />see above for lab <br />permeability test methods <br />Disturbed or <br />undisturbed sample: <br />Sieve analysis. See <br />above for permeability <br />test. <br />Compressibility <br /> -settlement <br /> -consolidation <br /> -shrink/swell <br /> -collapse <br /> Influenced by soil type, plasticity, loading, <br />consolidation history, degree of compaction, in- <br />situ unit weight, cementation. <br /> Embankment fill typically experiences immediate <br />settlement, consolidation (squeezing out of pore <br />water), and secondary compression <br /> Shrink/swell – largely dependent on soil plasticity <br />and clay content; fat clays are of concern. <br /> Collapse susceptibility w/wetting – foundation <br />deposits with dry unit weight approximately < 95 <br />pcf, low moisture content, above water table. <br />In Situ: settlement plates; <br />test fill measurement for <br />proposed fill <br />Laboratory: consolidation, <br />sieve analysis, Atterberg <br />limits, dry unit weight, <br />permeability, collapse <br />potential <br />Undisturbed sample: <br />dry unit weight, <br />consolidation, collapse <br />potential, permeability. <br />Disturbed or <br />undisturbed sample: <br />sieve analysis, <br />Atterberg Limits. <br />Erosion <br />-Internal erosion (IE) <br />-Surface erosion (SE) <br /> <br /> IE and SE influenced by soil type, in-situ dry unit <br />weight, gradation, degree of compaction, <br />plasticity, cementation, weathering. <br /> IE also influenced by embankment defects such <br />as internal cracking, under-compacted soil <br />adjacent to penetrations or lifts, dispersive soils, <br />gap grading, and inadequate/no filter. <br /> Potential for IE also relates to the soil’s <br />dispersibility (see below) <br /> <br />In Situ: VJT (SE) <br />Laboratory, direct erosion <br />tests: EFA, SERF, HET, <br />RETA. <br />Laboratory, indirect tests <br />for evaluating IE likelihood <br />and erosion resistance: <br />sieve analysis, Atterberg <br />limits, dry unit weight <br />Undisturbed sample: <br />EFA, SERF, HET, <br />RETA, dry unit weight <br />Disturbed or <br />undisturbed sample: <br />sieve analysis, <br />Atterberg Limits. <br />Dispersibility <br /> Typically montmorillonitic or illitic clays, high in <br />sodium, low to medium in dissolved salts, and <br />are easily erodible. <br /> Avoid using, selectively place, treat with lime, <br />protect from drying/cracking, and/or provide a <br />robust filter for dispersive soils. <br />Laboratory: Double <br />hydrometer, pinhole, <br />crumb test. Note that all <br />three tests are usually <br />required <br />Remolded sample: <br />crumb test, pinhole <br />test. Disturbed or <br />Undisturbed sample: <br />double hydrometer <br />Compaction <br />Characteristics <br /> Compaction increases strength and reduces <br />permeability, compressibility, and erodibility. <br />Field: test fill <br />Laboratory: Standard <br />Proctor Compaction <br />Disturbed sample. <br />1 Relatively undisturbed samples commonly obtained from thin-wall (e.g. Shelby) tube or modified California samplers. <br />2 Remolded (or reconstituted) samples can be created using soil from either undisturbed or disturbed3 samples. <br />3 Disturbed bag or bucket samples commonly obtained from split spoon sample, test pit spoil, or auger cuttings