Western Dam Engineering
<br /> Technical Note
<br />
<br />
<br />6
<br />provides a good reference for this type of information.
<br />Table 1 below also summarizes testing methods and
<br />associated design considerations for various index
<br />properties.
<br />Different sample types, volumes, and preparation
<br />methods are required for different types of laboratory
<br />tests. For example, most index property tests can be
<br />performed using disturbed samples (commonly
<br />obtained using split spoon or modified California
<br />samplers, or by hand from an auger flight, spoil pile or
<br />test pit). Conversely, if testing of in-situ properties is
<br />desired, engineering property testing such as triaxial
<br />shear strength, consolidation, collapse, and
<br />permeability tests require relatively undisturbed
<br />samples, such as obtained from thin-walled samplers.
<br />There are exceptions; for example, strength or
<br />permeability tests are often performed on remolded
<br />samples to enable modeling compacted embankment
<br />fill.
<br />
<br />Care should be taken to avoid sample disturbance
<br />when handling and transporting samples intended for
<br />in-situ properties testing from the field to the
<br />laboratory. Sample disturbance can significantly affect
<br />test results, possibly resulting in mis-characterization
<br />of a soil, especially for loose or weaker soils.
<br />Laboratory tests, along with the results of field
<br />observation and testing, can also be used to identify
<br />the properties of special or problematic soils or
<br />adverse ground conditions. These can include
<br />collapsible soils, dispersive soils, organic soils and peat,
<br />expansive soils, slaking shales and degradable soils,
<br />sensitive clays, and ground susceptible to fissures.
<br />Soil Classification & Description
<br />Soil classification is the grouping of a soil into a
<br />category, typically using an established system such as
<br />the USCS. Soil description is the systematic, precise,
<br />and complete naming of individual soils. The soil’s
<br />classification and description, as typically provided on
<br />a test hole log, should include as a minimum:
<br /> Apparent consistency (stiffness for fine-
<br />grained soils or density for coarse-grained
<br />soils)
<br /> Water content condition adjective (e.g., dry,
<br />moist, wet, saturated)
<br /> Color (e.g., red color can indicate weathered
<br />soil, green can indicate organic content)
<br /> Plasticity adjective for cohesive soils (e.g.,
<br />medium plasticity)
<br /> Minor and MAIN (capitalized) soil types (e.g.,
<br />clayey GRAVEL [GC])
<br /> USCS Group name and symbol (e.g., GC, GM,
<br />GW, GP, SC, SM, SW, SP, ML, CL, SP-SM, etc.)
<br /> Inclusions (e.g., trace amounts of other soil
<br />types, organic content)
<br /> Geologic name, or embankment zone, if
<br />known
<br />Field engineer’s or geologists make their best
<br />determination of the soil classification at the time of
<br />drilling and sampling. Final boring or test pit logs are
<br />typically checked and adjustments made as necessary
<br />based on the results of the laboratory testing. Here is
<br />a typical example of a soil description that may be
<br />found on a test hole log:
<br />“medium-dense, moist, red-brown, silty SAND
<br />(SM), trace fine gravel to coarse sand
<br />(Alluvium)”
<br />Soil descriptions should be provided for each main
<br />strata or zone of soil identified in the foundation and
<br />embankment. Standard methodology for visual soil
<br />classification is provided in ASTM D 2488 – Standard
<br />Practice for Description and Identification of Soils
<br />
<br />
<br />Assortment of soil testing equipment: (a) Atterberg Limits,
<br />(b) Sieve Analysis, (c) Consolidation, (d) Triaxial Shear
<br />a b
<br />c d
|