My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
DWR_2801679
DWR
>
Reference Library
>
2015
>
10
>
DWR_2801679
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 11:33:02 AM
Creation date
10/6/2015 9:54:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reference Library
Title
WESTERN DAM ENGINEERING NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2, JULY 2014
Author/Source
URS
Keywords
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION, SPECIFICATION TIPS, FIX A LEAKY PIPE, CONDUIT
Document Type - Reference Library
Research, Thesis, Technical Publications
Document Date
7/31/2014
Year
2014
Team/Office
Dam Safety
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Western Dam Engineering <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />13 <br />event these discussions need to be referred to later <br />(i.e., in the unfortunate case of dispute). <br />In addition to these regular meetings, it may be <br />desirable to define a meeting schedule at the initiation <br />of each new major work item of the project, so that <br />specific requirements of that work item can be <br />presented and discussed. <br />Anticipating Delays in the Delivery of <br />Specified Materials or Products <br />Engineers need to be aware that specified pre- <br />manufactured items, such as gates, valves, operators <br />and other mechanical systems may not be readily <br />available on the desired timeline during construction. <br />To help overcome this problem, standard off-the-shelf <br />items should be used in the design whenever possible, <br />rather than special-production items. In any event, <br />engineers should attempt to identify the availability of <br />required/specified manufactured items early, and <br />allow for long-lead items in the project and submittal <br />schedules. Experience indicates, for example, that the <br />delay between order and delivery of larger gate <br />systems can be several months. Therefore, provisions <br />should be made to require the ordering of these <br />materials early in the construction project to ensure <br />their availability when needed. As an alternate plan, <br />the owner may wish to procure long lead items in <br />advance of the project to be provided to the <br />Contractor. <br />Frequency/Location of Quality Control <br />Testing of Earth Fills <br />Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) testing <br />considerations for dam construction could easily fill a <br />separate article and are dependent on the level of <br />complexity of the project, confidence in the <br />contractor, and variability of available materials. QC <br />refers to the primary testing being conducted to <br />validate the quality of the completed work. QA refers <br />to testing performed to validate another party’s test <br />results (i.e. an owner doing spot check test to verify <br />contractor supplied testing). The assignment of <br />responsibility for QC testing was discussed in the <br />second article of this series. <br />The type, frequency and location of testing on an <br />embankment fill should be described under “QA/QC” <br />in the Earthwork section of the specifications, stating <br />who is responsible to perform the testing. This should <br />be described even if the owner/engineer is performing <br />the testing to notify the contractor of the testing plan. <br />This section provides a brief discussion of some key <br />considerations in selecting testing frequency for <br />earthfill materials commonly used in dam construction. <br />Numerous other QA/QC requirements typical of dam <br />construction are not covered. These may include <br />foundation preparation inspections, rebar inspections, <br />concrete testing, grouting, etc. <br />Low Permeability Core Materials <br />Representative tests to verify specified earthfill <br />properties, such as gradation, Atterberg limits, specific <br />gravity, and Proctor density curves, should be <br />performed during borrow area development or in the <br />stockpile area prior to fill placement. Frequency of this <br />testing may depend on the variability of the borrow <br />source materials, but in general should be on the order <br />of one test for every 10% of total required volume, <br />with the exception of Proctor tests. A sufficient <br />number of Proctor density curves should be obtained <br />to represent the range of material available. Periodic <br />one-point Proctor tests should be performed <br />throughout material placement to verify the <br />appropriate representative curve is being used for QC <br />comparison. <br />Frequency of compaction testing for critical earthfills, <br />such as those being placed for low permeability cores, <br />should be at least one per 2 to 5% of the total volume <br />(e.g., if 20,000 cy total are being placed, a test every <br />500 cy) or at least one per day, per area of placement. <br />Additional testing may be warranted (1) in areas where <br />the degree of compaction is suspected of being <br />inadequate; (2) in areas where small working areas <br />lead to rapid fill placement; and (3) in areas requiring <br />special compaction techniques. <br />Granular Materials <br />Compaction testing of granular materials (e.g., sand <br />filters) is generally not performed during placement <br />and instead QA/QC consists of visual inspection of the <br />method-based compaction procedures (visual <br />confirmation of number of passes of the specified <br />equipment). Gradation testing is the most important <br />for granular materials, and one test should be <br />performed for every 2 to 5% of total placement <br />volume for filter/drain materials and less frequently <br />for shell and bedding materials. Testing should be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.