Laserfiche WebLink
Discharge.-- <br />PLATTE RIVER BASIN <br />06714000 SOUTH PLATTE RIVER AT DENVER <br />Location.-- <br />Drainage and Period of Record.-- <br />Lat. 39°45'35",Long. 105°00'10", in NW¼SE¼ sec. 28, T.3 S., R.68 W., Denver County, Hydrologic Unit 10190003, on right <br />bank 90 ft Upstream from Nineteenth Street Bridge in Denver and 0.4 mi downstream from Cherry Creek. <br />3,861 mi². May 1889 to Oct. 1890 sporadic record. July 1895 to current year continuous. Monthly data only for <br />some periods. <br />Graphic water stage recorder, shaft encoder and Sutron 8210 high date rate DCP in a 72 inch by 72 inch precast concrete <br />structure with a 48 inch corrugated steel well. Primary reference gaeg is an electric drop tape, with a supplemental outside <br />wire weight gage. A city water line is plumbed to the gage for flushing the inlets. USACE is a cooperator on the gage, and <br />UDFCD has Alert instrumentation installed. Additionally, the UDFCD contracts with the USGS to operate a water quality <br />sampler there. <br />Equipment.-- <br />Hydrologic Conditions.-- <br />Gage-Height Record.-- <br />Datum Corrections.-- <br />Rating.-- <br />Discharge.-- <br />Special Computations.-- <br />Remarks.-- <br />Recommendations.-- <br />The primary record is hourly averages of fifteen minute data taken from satellite monitoring with chart backup. Daily <br />maximum and minimum stages for the satellite record checked to within 0.02 ft with the chart. The record is compete and <br />reliable, except for the following periods: December 9-10, 2009, when the record appeared to be affected by ice; and, May <br />17-18, 2010, when the DCP failed and chart back up data were not available. <br />Levels were last run on September 24, 2009, but were inconclusive due to conflicting readings from RM 1 and RM 2. No <br />correction was made at that time. <br />The control is a rock gabion dam approximately 50 feet below the gage. Rating No. 34 was begun in use on October 1, <br />2008. It is defined by measurements from 39.4 to 5340 cfs. Rating No. 34 was extended to 12,600 cfs using a peak flow <br />on July 25, 1998 that was indirectly calculated using records from downstream gages. Eighteen measurements (Nos. 985- <br />1002) ranging in discharge from 103 to 1120 cfs were made this year. A measurement of 1450 cfs was made during the <br />high flow period but was not used. The peak flow of 6170 cfs occurred 1315 on April 23, 2010 at a gage height of 8.57 ft <br />(gage height correction of -0.01 ft applied) with a shift of 0.00 ft. It exceeded Measurement 996, made on June 17, by 3.22 <br />ft in stage. Peak flow at this gage usually defies measurement — often occurring as a sharp, transitory rise in the evening. <br />Shifting control method was used all year. The channel has a sand bottom that is continually scouring and filling in the <br />gage pool formed by the control, causing both positive and negative shifts. Measurements show unadjusted shifts varying <br />between -0.14 to +0.04 feet. All measurements were given full weight, except No. 986, 989-991, 993, 994, 996, 1000 and <br />1001 which were adjusted up to 3% to smooth shift distribution. The highest measurement (No. 996) was adjusted 2%, <br />and was considered poor. A large gage height change occurred during the measurement due to an interruption for a <br />rescue operation. Shifts were prorated by time, considering movement of sand to be the primary shift mechanism. <br />Unadjusted high flow measurements indicate possible negative shifting at higher stages, but reliability of the high <br />measurements was not considered good enough to justify using stage-shift tables. Also, the rating is new, and time shifting <br />puts the peak closer to the rating. Stage tables may be used in future years if other measurements support the trend hinted <br />at in WY2010. In general, consideration to stage is given when time shifting at this gage, in order to give weight to effects <br />of storm peaks. While no special shifting was done this year, each storm event was analyzed to verify that the peak flow <br />had a shift that was consistent with any possible stage distribution. <br />The “spill”, as added to some of the measurements in the past, is the regulating discharge from the Farmers and Gardeners <br />Ditch. The spill is just upstream and across the channel from the gage. The ditch and associated Parshall flume are <br />covered and buried, so the spill emerges from a culvert. Normally there is no place below the spill where a good <br />measurement can be made, so upstream measurements are made with this “Spill” added to the total. There wasn’t any <br />spill during measurements this year, so none was added. It is impossible to actually measure the spill since it shoots out <br />from under a gate and sluices down to the river. Velocities are supercritical and the flow has air in it. Often 10 cfs is <br />estimated, based on a ditch rider statement that the head-gate will take a maximum of 35 cfs from the river and the ditch is <br />decreed at 24 cfs. At low flow, this estimate can have a significant effect on measurement accuracy. Extreme low flow <br />measurements have been made downstream of the Farmers and Gardeners Ditch spill and just upstream of the control <br />pool. Normally this section is too deep to wade. Discharge for December 9-10 was estimated from adjacent non-ice <br />affected record. Discharge for May 17-18 was estimated from good record trends before and after the period of missing <br />data. <br />The record is good, except for periods of ice effect and missing record, which are estimated and poor. Station maintained <br />by Jana Ash and Tony Arnett and record developed by Tony Arnett. <br />Run levels in the spring of 2011 and summarize past observations in a levels summary spreadsheet. <br />2010Water Year