Laserfiche WebLink
Discharge.-- <br />PLATTE RIVER BASIN <br />06722500 SOUTH SAINT VRAIN NEAR WARD <br />Location.-- <br />Drainage and Period of Record.-- <br />Lat. 40°05'27",Long. 105°30'50" <br />14.4 mi²; 1925-27,28-31, 54-73, 1992 to present. <br />Graphical water stage recorder, and digital shaft encoder (SE) connected to a Sutron Satlink data collection platform (DCP) <br />in a 42-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe shelter and well. The primary reference is a metal drop tape from an <br />adjustable reference point (RP) located on the equipment shelf of the shelter. No other supplemental references are <br />available. <br />Equipment.-- <br />Hydrographic Conditions.-- <br />Gage-Height Record.-- <br />Datum Corrections.-- <br />Rating.-- <br />Discharge.-- <br />Special Computations.-- <br />Remarks.-- <br />Recommendations.-- <br />Drainage area is 14.3 sq mi from topographic maps (RMNP quad.). Drainage is virtually uninhabited forested lands up to <br />the continental divide, with no artificial diversions. This site is commonly used for watershed studies. The gage is <br />approximately 3.5 miles downstream from Brainard Lake, a naturally occurring water body. Water passing this gage is <br />diverted into the Lefthand Creek basin about 1/3 mile downstream, at the Lefthand Ditch Diversion (LEFTHDCO). Normally <br />the entire flow is diverted up to the point where it spills over the Lefthand diversion structure. So the two gages report <br />similar, if not identical, discharges. However, the high flow point when water bypasses LEFTHDCO is not well defined. <br />Measurements made at this gage are sometimes also used for flow at the Lefthand gage, when it is observed that 100% is <br />being diverted. <br />The primary record is hourly averages of 15-minute telemetered data with graphical chart record as backup. The record is <br />complete and reliable, except for the following periods: November 5-12, 2008, when the gage was frozen; November 13, <br />2008 to May 10, 2009, when the gage was closed for winter and no gage-height information is available; May 11, 2009, <br />partial day record. The encoder held calibration all year. No datum corrections were required. One control correction was <br />required as follows: Work on the control was done on September 1, 2009. The channel was cleaned of a few large boulders <br />and the control was fortified with more cobble. The result was a +0.02 ft. rise in gage height. Measurement no. 199 was <br />performed prior to the control work resulting in a -0.03 shift. Measurement no. 200 was performed after the channel work <br />resulting in a -0.05 ft. shift. The shifts compensate for the rise in gage height from the control work. <br />Levels were run on October 14, 2009. RP was found to be 0.014 ft. high. No correction was made. <br />The control for low to moderate flow is a rock riffle composed of embedded river boulders approximately 30-feet <br />downstream from the shelter. The high water control is a sharp bend and gradient change in the stream channel <br />approximately 50-feet downstream of the gaging station. The control is subject to shifting boulders moving into and out of <br />the control area as well as material embedding and being released from the rock riffle. Moss growth and debris <br />accumulation is generally not an issue at this gage; however fill and scour conditions as well as control movement do <br />occur. Rating No. 11 developed in water year 2007 is defined by measurements from 4.74 to 156 cubic feet per second <br />(cfs). The rating was extended this year to 510 cfs to include a 2009 measurement of 317 cfs. Twelve measurements <br />(Nos. 190-201) were performed this year ranging in discharge from 4.68 cfs to 317 cfs. They cover the range of stage <br />experienced except for peak days June 26-27. The peak discharge of 494 cfs occurred at 2315 on June 26, 2009 at a <br />stage of 3.20 feet with a shift of +0.08 ft. It exceeded measurement No. 195 made on June 27, 2009 by 0.24 feet of stage. <br />Shifting control method was used all year. Unadjusted shifts ranged from -0.08 feet to +0.02 feet. All measurements were <br />given full weight unless specified differently below. Shifts were distribured by time and by stage. Shifts were distributed by <br />time as follows: Oct 1-Nov 12, 2008, ( Nov 12, 2008 – May 11, 2009 – Gage off for winter season) , and May 11-26, 2009. <br />Measurement 192 (May 26) was adjusted 3% to smooth transition between time and stage shifting. Shifts were <br />distributed by stage using two variable stage shift relationhsips: SSVWARCOVST01, applied May 26 – Sept 1, 2009 and <br />based on measurements made during the period. Measurement 194 (June 24) was adjusted 8% to better fit with <br />measurement 195. Measurement 194 was made under poor conditions and was rated fair. Measurement 195 (June 27) <br />was also a fair measurement, but was not adjusted as it is the highest measurement ever made at this gage. And, <br />SSVWARCOVST02, applied Sept 1-30, 2009. The second table was necessary to compensate for work done on the <br />control on September 1. <br />Discharges for November 5 thru 12, 2008 were estimated using values from the downstream station, LEFTHDCO. <br />Discharge for May 11, 2009 was estimated from partial day record. This is a partial year record. No record was kept for <br />the winter period (November 13, 2008 to May 10, 2009). <br />The record is good except for periods of no gage height record and ice affected record, which are estimated and poor. The <br />peak is rated as estimated and poor since it is higher than 150% of the highest measurement of 317 cfs. Station <br />maintained and record developed by Patrick Tyler. <br />Defining high flows remains a problem. High water measurements at or above 140 cfs cannot be waded. Crane <br />measurements off the bridge at the gage are difficult and poor due to turbulence caused by a constriction at the bridge <br />abutments, high velocities, and debris firmly lodged in the channel bed at the bridge section. Due to the remoteness of this <br />gage, efforts to find a more suitable measurement location have been unsuccessful. Moreover, under high water conditions <br />measurement at LEFTHDCO is not an option due to diversion practices and supercritical velocities encountered at the only <br />available cabling location due to the LEFTHDCO structure lay out. The cabling section at this gage should be improved <br />prior to high flow and the intakes shortened to avoid possible drawdown effects. <br />2009Water Year