Discharge.--
<br />PLATTE RIVER BASIN
<br />MIDDLE SAINT VRAIN AT PEACEFUL VALLEY
<br />Location.--
<br />Drainage and Period of Record.--
<br />Lat. 40 07’ 55”,Long. 105 31’ 00”, NE1/4 NW1/4 Sec. 24, T.2 N., R.73 W.
<br />Gage established on May 14, 1998 by State of Colorado, Division of Water Resources personnel. This gage will
<br />be a partial year record station.
<br />Graphical stage recorder, digital shaft encoder and Sutron 8210 Satellite Monitoring Data Collection Platform (DCP) in a
<br />42-inch corrugated metal pipe shelter and 42-inch steel stilling well. The primary reference is a metal drop tape and
<br />adjustable reference point (RP) located on the equipment shelf of the shelter. No other supplemental references are
<br />available. On October 16, 2008 the Sutron 8210 DCP and Sutron 8500 SE were replaced with a Sutron Satlink 2 DCP
<br />and a Sutron 56-0540 SE.
<br />Equipment.--
<br />Hydrographic Conditions.--
<br />Gage-Height Record.--
<br />Datum Corrections.--
<br />Rating.--
<br />Discharge.--
<br />Special Computations.--
<br />Remarks.--
<br />Recommendations.--
<br />16.8 square miles of drainage, comprised wholly of uninhabited forested lands with varying topography. Gage is located in
<br />the Indian Peak Wilderness Area of Roosevelt National Forest, at the Peaceful Valley / Camp Dick United States Forest
<br />Service campground facilities. No known diversions occur upstream from the gage. Marked diurnal flow occurs during peak
<br />snowmelt months. Due to heavy winter conditions and the remoteness of this gage, year-round operation of the gage is
<br />not possible.
<br />The primary record is hourly averages of 15-minute telemetered data with graphical chart record as backup. The record is
<br />complete and reliable, except for the following periods: October 13-16, 22-24, 2008 and November 5-12, 2008 when the
<br />gage was affected by ice ; and, November 13, 2008 to May 10, 2009 when the gage was closed for winter and no gage-
<br />height information is available . Installation of the new DCP and shaft encoder October 16, 2008 resulted in missing data
<br />values. These values were estimated using GH data before and after the construction with consideration to ice affect as ice
<br />still remained in the channel. Artificially elevated stage values of .01 ft. to .02 ft. incurred by performing discharge
<br />measurements immediately downstream from the gage, when the Hydrographer was directly in front of the inlet. The affect
<br />is considered to be negligible to the record, but the measurement GH’s were adjusted to the correct value.
<br />Levels were run on October 16 and 31, 2008 and then again on October 14, 2009. On October 31, 2008 several new
<br />reference marks were added to the station: RM #1, RM #2, and RM #3. Levels run on October 16, 2008 were used to
<br />establish a new RP index for the gage as the instrument shelf was replaced on this date. Levels were not run prior to
<br />replacement of the instrument shelf. Therefore, the gage was assumed to be stable this year, and this assumption is
<br />supported from level history showing no movement in the base gage since 1998 when the gage was initially indexed.
<br /> Levels run on October 31, 2008 were run to verify new RP index and establish additional reference marks (RM). The RP
<br />was discovered to be an average of 0.014 ft. low in elevation, no correction was made. When levels were run on October
<br />14, 2009, the RP was discovered to be an average of 0.014 ft. low in elevation, no correction was made.
<br />The control for low to moderate stages is a rock riffle approximately 15-feet downstream of the gage composed of
<br />embedded cobble and boulders. The high water control is a sharp bend and gradient change in the stream channel
<br />approximately 40-feet downstream for the gage. The low to moderate control is subject to shifting boulders moving in to
<br />and out of the control area as well as material embedding and being released from the rock riffle. Moss and debris
<br />accumulation is not an issue at this gage. Rating No. 4 in use since October 1, 2004 was continued this year. Rating No. 4
<br />is defined by measurements from 4.6 to 176 cubic feet per second (cfs). Twelve discharge measurements (Nos. 87-99)
<br />were performed this year ranging in discharge from 4.41 to 260 cfs. Measurements made this water year cover the range in
<br />stage except for June, 27, 2009, where mean daily GH exceeded the highest measured GH by .03 ft. of stage. The peak
<br />flow of 346 cfs occurred at 2000 on June 26, 2009 at a stage of 3.39 feet with a shift of -0.19 ft. It exceeded measurement
<br />No. 94 made on June 27, 2009 by 0.17 feet of stage.
<br />Shifting control method was used all year. Unadjusted shifts ranged from +0.01 to -0.19 feet. Shifts were distributed by
<br />time from Oct 1, 2008 to Jun 9, 2009. Shifts were distributed by stage using two variable stage-shift relationships:
<br />MIDSTECOVST01, based on Msmt. Nos. 92-94, was applied from Jun 9-27, 2009, and MIDSTECOVST02, based on
<br />Msmt Nos. 94-99, applied from Jun 27 – Sep 30, 2009.
<br />Discharge values during periods of ice effect were estimated from surrounding good record with consideration of
<br />temperature trends. This is a partial year record. No record was kept for the winter period (November 13, 2008 to May 10,
<br />2009). Very few measurements have been made in the upper ranges in flow. The high water measurement that defines the
<br />peak was made from the downstream bridge where holiday traffic required the use of 20 second counts.
<br />The record is good except during periods when the gage was ice affected, which is estimated and fair. The instantaneous
<br />peak is rated fair due to lack of rating definition. Station maintained and record developed by Patrick Tyler.
<br />Efforts should be taken in continuation of upper end rating development as conditions allow. Peak diurnal stages and
<br />higher flow rates occur in late May to early June around 22:00 to 24:00 hrs and short in duration making rating development
<br />at high flows difficult. Levels should be run in the spring at the opening of the station to verify the discrepancy in the RP
<br />elevation. Levels should also be run annually for the next several years to verify stability of newly established reference
<br />marks.
<br />2009Water Year
|