Discharge.--
<br />PLATTE RIVER BASIN
<br />06711500 BEAR CREEK AT SHERIDAN
<br />Location.--
<br />Drainage and Period of Record.--
<br />Lat. 39°39'08",Long. 105°01'57", in NW¼NW¼ sec. 5, T,5 S., R.68 W., Arapahoe County, Hydrologic Unit 10190002 on left
<br />bank just downstream from bridge on South Lowell Blvd., at Highway Department maintenance building at northwest city limits
<br />of Sheridan, 1.3 mi upstream from mouth, and 2.l mi west of city hall in Englewood.
<br />260 mi². April to Nov. 1914, March 1927 to current year. Monthly data only prior to Oct. 1933.
<br />Stevens A-35 graphic stage recorder was removed this year, and Sutron 8210 DCP with digital shaft encoder and phone
<br />(speech card) modem in a 42 inch corrugated metal shelter and well with supplemental outside wire weight gage remains.
<br />The wire weight gage was damaged by vandalism and has not been repaired. No outside readings were made during the
<br />2009 water year. The DCP can be accessed by phone. Currently, no backup to the shaft encoder is present.
<br />Equipment.--
<br />Hydrographic Conditions.--
<br />Gage-Height Record.--
<br />Datum Corrections.--
<br />Rating.--
<br />Discharge.--
<br />Special Computations.--
<br />Remarks.--
<br />Recommendations.--
<br />Flows are controlled by releases from Bear Creek Lake, approximately 6 miles upstream. The land between the gage and
<br />the Lake is urban, and sharp peaks are observed as a result of storm runoff. The gage is directly affected by local
<br />precipitation since there is a large storm culvert just upstream which drains a large shopping center. The peak flow usually
<br />occurs as a sharp, short-duration storm event.
<br />The primary record is hourly averaged 15-minute data from satellite with partial year chart back-up. The record is complete
<br />and reliable for the entire year, except for a few hours each day on Nov. 23, 2008 and May 14, 2009,and from May 14-
<br />Sept. 30, 2009 one 15 min value at 18:00 was missing on each day. The Nov. data was taken from the chart, and all other
<br />data was estimated. Possible ice effect was seen on November 26 and December 15. Ice affect was seen on December
<br />21-22, 2008. Corrections were made after clearing debris from the control (which results in a drop in gage height).
<br />Corrections in gage height as a result of debris on the control were applied as follows: Oct 2, 2008: -0.03 ft, applied to
<br />0000 Oct. 1 to 1500 October 2. November 13, 2008: -0.03 ft, manually applied back to a high water event on October 5,
<br />2100 that most likely deposited the debris. April 24, 2009, -0.07 ft, applied back to a high water event on April 18 that most
<br />likely deposited the debris. The inlets were flushed almost every visit in an attempt to keep the inlets clean and eliminate
<br />any flush corrections. Two such flush corrections were necessary and applied: June 17, +0.04 ft applied back a couple of
<br />hours to a low point in the hydrograph where the pipe most likely plugged up, and June 29, +0.03 ft applied back one hour
<br />to a low point on the hydrograph, where the pipe most likely plugged up.
<br />Levels were last run on July 26, 2006. No correction were necessary.
<br />The control for all stages is a rock and concrete dam approximately ten feet below the gage with about 5 ft. of drop behind
<br />it. Downstream conditions have never been observed to cause backwater at the gage. The dam has an uneven surface,
<br />with rebar sticking out in spots. Debris tends to accumulate at low flows, particularly in the fall when leaves are dropping.
<br /> Rating No. 32 was developed for the 1998 water year, and continued in use for the present year. It is defined by
<br />measurements to 661 cfs.. In past years the gage has experienced short peaks well above the rating , so the rating has
<br />been extrapolated to 3000 cfs. However, any flows above 1000 cfs need to be considered estimates. Nineteen
<br />measurements (Nos. 953 - 971) were made this year ranging in discharge from 6.16 to 147 cfs. They cover the range in
<br />discharge experienced except for days with lower mean daily flows on Nov 11, Dec 6, and Apr 15; and hogher mean daily
<br />flows on April 25-29, May 1-3, and 25-27, June 2-6, and 26, 2009. The peak flow of 795 cfs occurred at 2145 on Jul 25,
<br />2009 at a gage-height of 4.96 feet with a shift of 0.00 feet. It peak exceeded measurement No. 962 (made on April 29,
<br />2009), by 1.65 ft. in stage.
<br />Shifting control method was used for the record year. Shifts were caused by scour and fill of the approach pool and
<br />material passing over the control. Shifts were distributed by time with consideration to stage for the entire water year.
<br />Measurements show shifts varying from –0.02 to + 0.01 ft. Shifts were distributed by time. All measurements were given
<br />full weight except for Nos. 957, 960, 963, 965, and 970 which were adjusted up to 4% to smooth distribution.
<br /> Consideration to stage was given between No 961 (4/16) and No. 962 (4/29) by using the event peak on 4/18 as a
<br />distribution point. Consideration to stage was given between No 967 (7/22) and No. 968 (8/05) by using the yearly peak
<br />flow event on 7/25 as a distribution point. Flow conditions are relatively steady year-round and fluctuate little from rain
<br />events. The majority of flow represents a controlled release from Bear Creek Lake approximately 6 miles upstream. This
<br />steady flow allows for reasonable assumptions to be made during periods of estimated record.
<br />Computed record was used for possible ice affect days of November 26 and December 15. December 21- 22 were
<br />estimated from temperatures and adjacent good record.
<br />The record is rated as good, except for periods of possible ice effect, which are fair and periods of ice effect, which are
<br />estimated and poor. Station maintained and record developed by Jana Ash.
<br />Continue visits every two weeks to ensure the control stays clear of debris, especially after rain events. The wire weight
<br />gage needs to be replaced or a staff pounded into the streambed. If possible, extra visits should be made during extreme
<br />cold to break ice in the well. Light construction should be done to remove the catch points on the control to help with debris
<br />affecting gage height. The rating above 1000 cfs needs to be confirmed by slope-area or some other indirect method.
<br />2009Water Year
|