Laserfiche WebLink
1NATER LEVELS IN SELECTED BEDRaCK AND ALLUVfAL <br />AQL�IFERS <br />4F 1NESTERN C�L�RADO► <br />Z000 <br />This report presents water level data from 57 wells Iocated in Archuleta, Delta, GarField, <br />Jackson, La Plata, Mesa, Moffat, Montrose, and Rio Blanco Counties. Most of the wells for <br />which data are reported were originally constructed in the 1970's by fihe United States <br />Geological Survey as a part of their statewide mvnitoring well network. The U.S.G,S. <br />routinely measured water levels in these wells until 1982. Tha# historical data is included in <br />this report, along with mvre recent data gathered by the Colorado Division of Water <br />Resources. <br />The wells listed in this report are now part of a state-wide water le�el monitoring network <br />funded by Senate Bilf 20� �198i Legislative Session}. That legislation directed that a <br />portion of the fees collected for water well permits be used for the establishment of a <br />program to monitor ground water ie�els throughout the state. <br />In 1991, the Division of Water Resources initiated a program to monitor water le�els in <br />about 50 of the wells that had been a part of the U.S,G.S. monitoring system. A small <br />number of additional wells measured are used for irrigation, stock watering, or domestic <br />purposes. Several of the Rio Blanco County wells are also measured at least quarterly in <br />connection with the ongoing monitoring in and around the C-b oil shale tract, and the <br />solution mining operation of North American Chemical Company's White Ri�er nahcolite <br />(sodium bicarbonate) plant. These data are also presented where available. No wells were <br />measured by DWR in �994. <br />in this report, the wells are grouped first by county in alphabeticai order and then by <br />township, range, and section within each county. Only 1 well is rneasured in each of the <br />following counties; Archuleta, La Plata, Mesa, and Moffat. Rio Bfanco County contains the <br />larges# number of wells (34} being monitored. The well I.D., shown on each tabular data <br />page, and along the left margin of each hydrograph describes the wef I location in the <br />standard well numbering system used by the Bureau of Reclamation and the United States <br />Geotogical Survey. The aquifers monitored include the alluvium, the Fruitland, Mesa Verde, <br />Wasatch, North Park, San Jose, Dakota/Burro Canyon, Green RE�er, Uinta and Parachute <br />Creek members or formations. The specific aquifer being monitored in a well is shown on <br />the data sheet for that well. <br />In addition to the tabular data, the water level change for each well is presented on a <br />hydrograph. When interpreting the hydrographs, you should note carefully the month and <br />year of the measurement, as there is a 9 or 10 year data gap between the his#oric U.S.G.S. <br />data and the DWR data. GeneraEly, this gap occurs during the years between 1979 and <br />1991. The dashed seQment on each hvdrograph identifies the period durinQ which no data <br />were gathered. In addition, some data points that were obviously� incvrrect ha�e heen <br />deleted before preparation of the hydrographs. The hydrograph for each well is presented <br />on the page opposite the tabular data. Hydrographs were not created for wells with only 2 <br />or 3 data points. <br />