My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
DWR_2882539
DWR
>
Publications and Reports
>
2016
>
03
>
DWR_2882539
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 11:41:07 AM
Creation date
3/22/2016 11:10:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications and Reports
Title
GROUND WATER LEVELS IN THE ALLUVIAL AND BEDROCK AQUIFERS OF WESTERN COLORADO
Year
2005
Document Type - Publications and Reports
Ground Water Levels Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WATER LEVELS iN SELECTED ALLUVIAL AND BEDR�CK <br />AQUlFERS <br />�F WESTERN COL4RADa <br />20�5 <br />This report presents water le�el data from 57 welis located in Archuleta, Delta, GarField, <br />Jackson, La Plata, Mesa, Moffat, Montrose, and Rio Blanco Counties. Most of the wells for <br />which data are reported were originalfy cvnstructed in the 1970's by the LJni#ed States <br />Geological Survey (USGS} as a part of their statewide monitoring well network. The USGS <br />routinely measured water levels in these wells until 1982. <br />A new report format was created in 2�04 and this format is used in this report. This is the <br />result vf placing all statewide water level data intv HYDR�BASE, which is a uniform database <br />for all data collected and managed by the Division of Water Resources. Tabular data are <br />presented for each well for the pre�ious 10 years and graphical data are presented for the <br />entire period of record. All historical measurement data is available in an Access database <br />format on request. It is anticipated that continual impro�ements in data presentation and <br />format will be made in future editions af this report. <br />Due to budget constraints, no water le�el measurements were made in 2�D2. The most <br />recent water le�els shown in this report were taken during September and �ctober of 2005. <br />�f the 57 wells listed in the report, water le�els were obtained in 54 of the wells. <br />The wells listed in this report are now part of a statewide water le�el monitoring network <br />funded by Senate Bill 200 �1987 Legislative Session}. That legislation directed that a <br />portion of the fees colfected for applications for water well permits be used for the <br />establishment o� a program to monitor ground water le�els throughout the state. <br />In 1991, the Di�ision of Water Resvurces initiated a program fo monitor water fevels in <br />about 50 of the wells that had been a part of the USGS monitoring system. A small number <br />of additional wells measured are used for irrigation, stock watering, or domestic purposes. <br />Several of the Rio Bfanco County wells are akso measured at least quarterly in connection <br />with the ongoing mvnitoring in and around the C-B oi! shale tract, and the solution mining <br />operation of Natural 5oda Inc.'s White River nahcolite {sodium bicarbonate) plant. These <br />data are also presented where a�ailable. <br />In this report, the wells are sorted by location number. Only one well is measured in each of <br />the following counties: Archuleta, La Plata, Mesa, and Moffat. Rio Blanco County contains <br />the largest number of welis (33) being monitored. The well name, shown for each well <br />describes the weil location in the standard well numbering system used by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and the USGS. The aquifers monitored include the allu�ium, the Fruitland, <br />Mesa Verde, Wasatch, North Park, San Jose, Dakota/Burro Canyon, Green River, Uinta <br />and Parachute Creek members vr formations. The specific aquifer being monitored in a <br />well is shown on the data sheet for that well. <br />Tabular data are presented for each well for the pre�ious 10 years. Graphical data are <br />presented for the entire period vf � record. When interpreting the hydrographs, you should <br />note carefiully the month and year of the measurement, as there is a 9- or 10-year da#a gap <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.