Laserfiche WebLink
OF'Cal <br /> p DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> David H.Getches,Executive Director <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> 18 7G * DAVID C.SHELTON, Director <br /> Richard D.Lamm <br /> Governor <br /> DATE: October 16, 1985 <br /> TO: Dave Shelt <br /> FROM: Fred Barr <br /> RE: MID-CON ENT SHOW CAUSE AND SUSPENSION <br /> Now that the Mid-Continent Show Cause issue is resolved, I want to present <br /> some thoughts and observations - particularly in regard to the day of <br /> suspension when Candace Thompson and I were at the site. <br /> It appears to me that the issue from the Division's perspective was not <br /> successfully carried to the community. From what I heard on the radio, read <br /> in the paper and heard from miners and people in the community, the impression <br /> was that the mine had been penalized for the violations that occurred in <br /> May, 1984. The impression is that Mid-Continent was overwhelmed by the heavy <br /> snow, and as a result Coal Creek was polluted. <br /> A second observation is that the community and local government were, to <br /> varying degrees, surprised that the state had the authority to actually <br /> shut-down the mine as a punitive measure. <br /> A third observation is that it was perceived to be as much a federal <br /> Office of Surface Mining (OSM) action as a state action. There are some who <br /> believe the state was forced into the action by OSM. <br /> It is possible that the Mid-Continent case may be a lively topic at future <br /> operator, environmental , agency and legislative meetings. From our <br /> perspective, there are some points that should be made. <br /> Under the current enforcement and civil penalty structure, the Show Cause <br /> Order and suspension is an appropriate additional enforcement measure. The <br /> threat of a suspension of a permit removes, to a high degree, the possibility <br /> for a business to choose not to comply as an economically rational decision. <br /> It is an effective deterrent because it introduces an unknown economic <br /> variable into the business decision process. Without that -variable, an <br /> operator can project the possible civil penalty for failure to comply and <br /> choose not to comply if he can gain more money by doing so. <br /> The alternative to the Show Cause Order as a deterrent to significant <br /> violations of the law are the Cessation Order and the civil penalty for <br /> multiple days. However, at this time they are not as effective tools as the <br /> Show Cause Order for the following reasons. <br /> 423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />