My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (142)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (142)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 7:36:17 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 7:57:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OF'Cal <br /> p DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> David H.Getches,Executive Director <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> 18 7G * DAVID C.SHELTON, Director <br /> Richard D.Lamm <br /> Governor <br /> DATE: October 16, 1985 <br /> TO: Dave Shelt <br /> FROM: Fred Barr <br /> RE: MID-CON ENT SHOW CAUSE AND SUSPENSION <br /> Now that the Mid-Continent Show Cause issue is resolved, I want to present <br /> some thoughts and observations - particularly in regard to the day of <br /> suspension when Candace Thompson and I were at the site. <br /> It appears to me that the issue from the Division's perspective was not <br /> successfully carried to the community. From what I heard on the radio, read <br /> in the paper and heard from miners and people in the community, the impression <br /> was that the mine had been penalized for the violations that occurred in <br /> May, 1984. The impression is that Mid-Continent was overwhelmed by the heavy <br /> snow, and as a result Coal Creek was polluted. <br /> A second observation is that the community and local government were, to <br /> varying degrees, surprised that the state had the authority to actually <br /> shut-down the mine as a punitive measure. <br /> A third observation is that it was perceived to be as much a federal <br /> Office of Surface Mining (OSM) action as a state action. There are some who <br /> believe the state was forced into the action by OSM. <br /> It is possible that the Mid-Continent case may be a lively topic at future <br /> operator, environmental , agency and legislative meetings. From our <br /> perspective, there are some points that should be made. <br /> Under the current enforcement and civil penalty structure, the Show Cause <br /> Order and suspension is an appropriate additional enforcement measure. The <br /> threat of a suspension of a permit removes, to a high degree, the possibility <br /> for a business to choose not to comply as an economically rational decision. <br /> It is an effective deterrent because it introduces an unknown economic <br /> variable into the business decision process. Without that -variable, an <br /> operator can project the possible civil penalty for failure to comply and <br /> choose not to comply if he can gain more money by doing so. <br /> The alternative to the Show Cause Order as a deterrent to significant <br /> violations of the law are the Cessation Order and the civil penalty for <br /> multiple days. However, at this time they are not as effective tools as the <br /> Show Cause Order for the following reasons. <br /> 423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.