My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-05_REVISION - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2012-03-05_REVISION - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:54:45 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 3:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/5/2012
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review (Emailed)
From
Susan Burgmaier
To
Brock Bowles
Type & Sequence
TR72
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hernandez, Alysha <br />From: <br />Burgmaier, Susan <br />Sent: <br />Monday, March 05, 2012 3:26 PM <br />To: <br />Bowles, Brock <br />Cc: <br />Brown, Sandy; DRMS- Coal -Admin <br />Subject: <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine (C1996083) TR -72 Preliminary Adquacy Review <br />Brock — I have completed my preliminary adequacy review of the surface water related proposals in the TR -72 <br />application, and have the following comments to forward to the operator. <br />1. The revised Sedcad modeling provided by Bowie Resources, LLC (BRL) indicates that the additional disturbance <br />created with the gob pile expansion will result in increased runoff to Pond F. Accordingly, the sediment storage <br />of the pond must be reduced by half to accommodate the additional runoff volume. BRL has revised the model <br />assuming there will be one year of sediment storage, down from the original plan for two years' storage. In <br />reviewing the quarterly sediment pond reports provided by BRL since Pond F was constructed, BRL has reached <br />the maximum sediment capacity and been required to clean Pond F annually. If BRL increases the disturbed <br />area and subsequent runoff volume as predicted in the proposed gob pile expansion plan, BRL would need to <br />clean the pond on average every six months. The Division is concerned that this increased frequency may not be <br />manageable long term, and is inconsistent with Rule 4.05.6(3)(a), requiring "...adequate sediment storage <br />volume and periodic sediment removal to effect compliance with Rule 4.05.2(7)." BRL should consider options <br />for increasing the volume of the pond. <br />2. Page App. B -7 , the flow characteristics for the Pond F Steel Flume, show a side slope of 1.5:1. The currently <br />approved design shows aside slope of 0:1, which is consistent with the currently installed flume. Please revise <br />the design to reflect the existing sideslopes of 0:1. <br />3. Also on page App. B -7, the required peak discharge is listed as 35.52 CFS. The Sedcad run shows a peak <br />discharge of 54.47 CFS. Please also revise this figure to 54.47, as shown in the Sedcad model output (page App. <br />B -40). <br />4. With the existing configuration of the Pond F flume, the capacity is 54.54 CFS. The proposed gob pile expansion <br />will result in a peak flow of 54.47 CFS, near maximum capacity of the flume, with insufficient freeboard. BRL will <br />need to revise the design and propose a larger flume to ensure that the required freeboard of 0.3' is maintained <br />at peak discharge. <br />Should you or the operator have questions or need additional information, please let me know. <br />Susan L. Burgmaier <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver CO 80203 <br />303 - 866 -3567 x 8111 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.