2011-11-08_REVISION - M1980244 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: M1980244
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 11/8/2011
• Doc Name: Response- via email.
• From: CC&V
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: TR62
• Email Name: TC1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

i4 logo -" etz5
Cazier, Tim `Tlz- 6 2.. a ESAeNse
From: Corner, Timm [TComer @AngloGoldAshantiNA.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:28 AM
To: Cazier, Tim
Subject: RE: LOB Project vs. VLF Phase 4c Berm Raise
Categories: CC &V
Tim,
I confirmed with AMEC that 80 -mil single -sided textured LLDPE was used for VLF Phase 4c Berm Raise.
Timm
From: Cazier, Tim fmailto :Tim.Cazier(astate.co.usl
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:14 AM
To: Corner, Timm
Subject: RE: LOB Project vs. VLF Phase 4c Berm Raise
Timm,
For the purpose of clarification, my question with respect to using the 60- or 80 -mil LLDPE was directed towards the
material used for the, not the LOB project. Can you confirm the 80 -mil single -sided textured LLDPE was also used for the
subject berm raise?
Thanks.
Tim Cazier, P.E.
Environmental Protection Specialist
Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety
1313 Sherman Street, Room 215
Denver, CO 80203
ph: 303 - 866 -3567 x8169
fax: [phone]
tim.cazier @state.co.us
From: Corner, Timm fmailto :TComer©AngloGoldAshantiNA.coml
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 3:36 PM
To: Cazier, Tim
Subject: RE: Next CC &V Inspection
Tim,
I followed up on the liner at the LOB Project. It was the same liner we used at Phase 5: 80 -mil single -sided textured.
Timm
1