My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2011-09-22_ENFORCEMENT - C1982056 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:19 PM
Creation date
9/23/2011 7:42:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
9/22/2011
Doc Name
Email Regarding Questions & Comments on Abatement Plan
From
Dustin Czapla
To
Jason Musick
Violation No.
CV2011005
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Musick, Jason <br />From: Czapla, Dustin <br />Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:59 AM <br />To: Musick, Jason <br />Cc: Shuey, Steve; Hernandez, Daniel <br />Subject: RE: Twentymile Coal, LLC - Foidel Creek Mine (C -82 -056), NOV CV- 2011005 Abatement <br />Plan <br />Hello Jason, <br />Just a couple questions /comments regarding Twenty Mile Coals's (TC) abatement plan: <br />1) Abatement Step 1 requires that TC determine how much of the waste material is present at the sites, and <br />that this step has already been completed. At the Deakins Pit, how have they determined how much of <br />the material has already been backfilled into the pit slopes, or have they only addressed the stockpiled <br />material that we observed during our inspection? <br />2) Abatement Step 2 states that the existing pile at the Deakins Pit will be transported to the Ross Pit. Is <br />this only referring to the stockpiled material, or does this also include the material that has already been <br />backfilled into the pit slopes? The backfilled waste material at the Deakins Pit will also need to be <br />removed. According to Steve Baker (Deakins Pit operator) the waste material was used to backfill much <br />of the northern pit slope. Also, Minerals would like to have the waste material either segregated at the <br />two gravel pits separately, or have all of the material returned to the coal mine and separated there. We <br />do not want the waste material transported between the two gravel pits. The Bower Brothers are not the <br />landowners nor the permit holder for the Ross Pit, so in order to minimize potential conflict with the <br />landowner /permit holder, we do not want to approve further importation of this material to this pit. <br />3) Before TC or their contractor removes the waste processing equipment from the gravel pits, we would <br />like to require DRMS inspections of the sites to ensure that all of the waste material has been removed <br />to our satisfaction. This will be particularly important at the Deakins Pit in order to ensure that all of the <br />waste material has been removed from the backfilled pit slopes. <br />Thank you, <br />Dustin Czapla <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />101 South 3 Suite 301 <br />Grand Junction, CO 81501 <br />Phone: (970) 243 -6299 <br />Fax: (970) 241 -1516 <br />From: Musick, Jason <br />Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:02 AM <br />To: Czapla, Dustin <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.