My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-18_REVISION - C1983059
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1983059
>
2011-07-18_REVISION - C1983059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:35:48 PM
Creation date
9/9/2011 8:19:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1983059
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/18/2011
Doc Name
Response to AVS
From
Johanna Cramer
To
Joe Dudash
Type & Sequence
MR26
Email Name
JJD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dudash, Joe <br />From: Cramer, Johanna <br />Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 3:29 PM <br />To: Dudash, Joe <br />Subject: RE: TerrorCreek MR26ResponseMemo.docx <br />Joe, <br />It's too late to call AVS, but I would like to do that and discuss this with them and give you my answer. Will that work? <br />Thanks <br />Johanna Cramer <br />Corporate Compliance /Bonding Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />303 - 866 -3567, extension 8114 <br />From: Dudash, Joe <br />Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 2:57 PM <br />To: Cramer, Johanna <br />Subject: RE: TerrorCreek MR26ResponseMemo.docx <br />When you and 1 had discussed this, we concluded that there was an exemption under Rule (83a)(b) when it could be <br />demonstrated that the person has no direct or indirect control of the loadout's operations. Why would they have to <br />show no control if they submit a list of officers and directors? The idea of showing no control is so that they wouldn't <br />have to provide the list of officers and directors. Please explain. <br />From: Cramer, Johanna <br />Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 2:39 PM <br />To: Dudash, Joe <br />Subject: RE: TerrorCreek MR26ResponseMemo.docx <br />They still have to submit officers and directors because they own 22 % of Oxbow, then they still need to show they have <br />no control. Under new rules they wouldn't but we aren't under the new rules and that's what I discussed with Susan <br />who discussed with Sandy. <br />Johanna Cramer <br />Corporate Compliance /Bonding Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />303 - 866 -3567, extension 8114 <br />From: Dudash, Joe <br />Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 1:50 PM <br />To: Cramer, Johanna <br />Subject: RE: TerrorCreek MR26ResponseMemo.docx <br />I have one question concerning your memo. Your first request is that Oxbow supply the names etc of the officers and <br />directors of Oxbow- Crestview so that they can be put into AVS. However, the reason why Oxbow is attempting to show <br />that Crestview does not control the operations of the Terror Creek Loadout is so that Oxbow does not have to supply all <br />of the names for Crestview, per Rule 83a)(b). Apparently, there are a lot of names. So can I just forward your second <br />request for more information? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.