My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01-20_REVISION - C1980007 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2011-01-20_REVISION - C1980007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:29:14 PM
Creation date
1/21/2011 1:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/20/2011
Doc Name
Review & Comments and Responses
From
DRMS
To
Mountain Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR124
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />January 20, 2011 <br />Kathleen G. Welt <br />Mountain Coal Company, LLC <br />P.O. Box 591 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />Re: West Elk Mine <br />Technical Revison No. 124 (TR-124) <br />Addition of Maximum Projected Areal Extent of Potential Mining <br />Dear Ms. Welt: <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S ION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />The DRMS has reviewed your letter of January 14, 2011 that you submitted in response to our <br />preliminary adequacy review letter of December 22, 2010. <br />Your responses to our comments 2 through 5, 7, and 8 are adequate. We have the follow-up comments, <br />below, which correspond in numbering to our previous comments and your responses. <br />1. Please add to Table 8 of Exhibit 71 baseline monitoring of the springs located in SE % Section 2- <br />R14S-R90W. The current baseline monitoring plan in Exhibit 71 was based on the mine plan <br />approved in PR-12, which did not include the longwall panel extensions proposed in TR-124 (see <br />Section 5.0 of the Exhibit 71). <br />6. To make it clear that mining will be approved only within the Projected Potential Mining Area as <br />that area is shown on Map 51, please remove the word "approximate" from page 1 of Exhibit 55B <br />and page 1 of Exhibit 60E. <br />9. <br />a) On your submitted page 2.05-170, immediately after the words ".additional reflector stations <br />will be added", please add the words "at approximately 300-foot spacing along the entire <br />length of the portion of the Deep Creek Ditch that will be undermined upstream from the <br />aforementioned five stations". <br />b) Please update the monitoring and repair plan for the Deep Creek Ditch in Section <br />2.05.6(6)(f)(iii) of the permit application to include the additional section of the ditch that may <br />be undermined in the Projected Potential Mining Area. <br />c) Please either direct us to or add to the appropriate places in the permit application a prediction <br />of the worst possible consequences from subsidence and a monitoring plan for the Deep Creek <br />Ditch Flume (the ditch's elevated steel pipeline that crosses Deep Creek and the concrete <br />collection box at the pipeline outlet). <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction 9 Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.