My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-30_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2010-04-30_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:11:09 PM
Creation date
10/15/2010 10:36:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/30/2010
Doc Name
Comments
From
Robert B. Cain
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:7 <br />Robert B. Cain <br />8834 Deifendeffer Road <br />Yost Office Box 520 <br />Rye, CO 51069 <br />Phone 719489-2056 <br />Fax 313-557-4212 <br />April 30, 2002 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 50203 <br />Attn: Mr. Anthony Waldron <br />Dear Mr. Waldron & the Division: <br />ber[. cain(a)sWband. net <br />Re: GCC Rio Grande, inc., <br />rile No M-21002-004 <br />As a concerned citizen and resident of Pueblo County, l have reviewed the application for <br />reclamation submitted by GCC Rio Grande, Inc., and wish to bring the following deficiencies to <br />your attention. <br />Rule 3.1.5 (2) It is proposed to backfill the mined pit with an average of 10 feet of overburden <br />3.1.5 (9) f from the succeeding pit. This is proposed to be "graded and compacted" with <br />a bulldozer. This would be inadequate to prevent differential settling. In 50 <br />years the result wi l l be a series of holes depending on age and depth of ti 11. An <br />engineered compaction plan is needed. <br />MAPS: 13-2, C-1, C-2 and Exhibit 1~ <br />Rule 6.2.1(2) The scale of maps C- 1, C-2 and r at 1"=2000' does not meet scale requirements <br />Of 1 "-50' to V-660'. <br />The scale of Exhibit.F is mistakenly shown as 1 "=2000' but is really V= 1000'. <br />Rules 6.3.1(2) The surface ownership map C-1 does not show the names of adjacent land <br />& 6.4.3(a) owners. <br />Rules 6.3.2 & Maps required to show existing contours and watercourses, which are based <br />6.4.3 On USGS snaps, are so blurred and indistinct that these features cannot be <br />seen. <br />Rule 6.3.3(b) & Map C-2 does not show the location of topsoil stockpiling areas. <br />6.3.5(2)(c)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.